Webb v Webb [1991] 1 WLR 1410 (ChD) [1994] QB 696 (ECJ)

Facts

  • The dispute arose between a father and son regarding the ownership of a property held in trust and located in France.
  • The father, as claimant, sought a declaration that he was the beneficial owner of the French property, even though it was registered in his son's name.
  • The trust was established under foreign (French) law, raising cross-border issues.
  • The central question was whether the English courts had jurisdiction to hear the claim or if it fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of the French courts, given the property's location.
  • The claim centered on the rights under the trust arrangement, not on changes to the legal title of the property.

Issues

  1. Whether claims for a declaration of beneficial ownership in trust assets located abroad constitute claims in rem (rights over property) or in personam (rights against a person).
  2. Whether Article 16 of the Brussels Convention, which provides for exclusive jurisdiction in matters concerning immovable property, applied to the claim.
  3. Whether English courts could exercise jurisdiction over trust disputes relating to property situated outside their territory.

Decision

  • The English High Court held that the claim was in personam and thus outside the scope of Article 16 of the Brussels Convention.
  • The European Court of Justice (ECJ) upheld this view, confirming that claims seeking a declaration of beneficial ownership in trust assets are in personam.
  • Consequently, the exclusive jurisdiction rule for immovable property under Article 16 did not apply.
  • The courts determined that English courts had jurisdiction over the claim, despite the property being situated in France.

Legal Principles

  • Distinction between in rem claims (affecting rights over property) and in personam claims (enforcing personal obligations) is critical for determining jurisdiction in cross-border disputes.
  • Article 16 of the Brussels Convention grants exclusive jurisdiction only for in rem claims relating to immovable property.
  • Claims enforcing equitable interests in trust assets are generally in personam and not subject to Article 16's exclusive jurisdiction rule.
  • The proper forum for cross-border trust litigation depends on the nature of the claim, legal framework, and situs of the trust assets.

Conclusion

Webb v Webb clarified that cross-border trust disputes involving declarations of beneficial ownership are in personam and do not trigger the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where the property is located under Article 16 of the Brussels Convention, allowing English courts to adjudicate such matters even where the trust property is abroad.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal