## Facts

- Henry Clyde Stokes died in Louisiana from work-related injuries in June 1967.
- Stokes lived with Willie Mae Weber, to whom he was not married, and supported their children.
- Stokes also had four legitimate minor children; his lawful wife was committed to a mental hospital.
- Two children represented by Weber were nonmarital and “unacknowledged” under Louisiana law; one was born after Stokes’s death.
- Louisiana’s workers’ compensation statute placed unacknowledged nonmarital children outside the statutory class of “children,” treating them as “other dependents” eligible only if higher-priority classes did not exhaust the statutory maximum.
- The four legitimate children were awarded the maximum allowable death benefits, leaving the two unacknowledged nonmarital children with no recovery.
- Weber challenged the denial as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

## Issues

1. Whether a state may, consistent with the Equal Protection Clause, deny dependent, unacknowledged nonmarital children the right to share in workers’ compensation death benefits when legitimate dependent children recover the full award.
2. Whether the inferior statutory classification of such dependent children bears a sufficient relationship to the compensatory purposes of workers’ compensation.

## Decision

- The Court held that Louisiana’s denial of equal recovery rights to dependent, unacknowledged nonmarital children violated the Equal Protection Clause.
- The Court reasoned that the exclusion of these dependents bore no significant relationship to the recognized purposes of workers’ compensation, which is to support dependents after a worker’s death.
- The Court rejected justifications grounded in promoting legitimacy or family structure where the statutory scheme functioned by penalizing children for their parents’ conduct rather than serving the compensation system’s remedial aims.
- The Louisiana Supreme Court’s judgment was reversed and the case remanded.
- Justice Blackmun concurred in the result; Justice Rehnquist dissented. The vote was 8–1.

## Legal Principles

- A state may not distribute workers’ compensation death benefits through a scheme that disadvantages dependent nonmarital children based solely on birth status when they are similarly situated to marital children in economic dependency.
- Classifications affecting nonmarital children must, at minimum, have a meaningful relationship to legitimate statutory objectives; moral or punitive aims directed at parents cannot justify depriving dependent children of compensatory benefits.
- Workers’ compensation death benefits are directed to wage-loss replacement and dependent support; statutory eligibility rules that effectively exclude certain dependents must be justified by those compensatory purposes.

## Conclusion

The Court ruled that Louisiana could not constitutionally deny workers’ compensation death benefits to dependent, unacknowledged nonmarital children while granting full recovery to dependent marital children, because the discriminatory classification was not meaningfully related to the compensatory purpose of supporting dependents after a worker’s death.


Weber v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 406 U.S. 164 (1972)