Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237

Facts

  • The case concerned an allegation of battery, focusing on the requirements for liability in English tort law.
  • The dispute involved physical contact between the claimant and defendant; the nature and intent of the contact were at issue.
  • The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the defendant’s actions met the threshold for battery, specifically considering intent, hostility, and consent.
  • Socially acceptable interactions and their legal implications formed part of the factual inquiry.

Issues

  1. Whether battery requires not only intentional and direct physical contact but also that such contact is accompanied by hostility or an absence of consent.
  2. How the concepts of hostility and consent should be interpreted in relation to liability for battery.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that for an act to constitute battery, the physical contact must be intentional, direct, and accompanied by hostility or lack of consent.
  • The court clarified that not all physical contact amounts to battery; lawful justification or consent can render contact non-actionable.
  • Hostility was interpreted as absence of lawful justification or consent, rather than requiring ill will or animosity.

Legal Principles

  • Battery in tort law requires intentional and direct application of force without lawful justification.
  • Mere physical contact is insufficient for battery; there must be hostility or absence of consent.
  • Hostility is defined as the lack of consent or lawful justification, not as personal animosity.
  • Consent (express or implied) serves as a defense to battery and is evaluated in context.
  • The requirement for hostility or absence of consent helps distinguish between unlawful and socially acceptable contact.

Conclusion

Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237 clarified that hostility or lack of consent is required for battery in English tort law, ensuring liability is imposed only for intentional, unjustified, and non-consensual physical contact, thereby shaping the legal boundaries of personal autonomy and bodily integrity.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal