## Facts

- Amy Woodland, a pupil, suffered serious injuries during a swimming lesson organized by her school.
- The lesson took place at a local swimming pool managed by a third-party contractor.
- Woodland claimed against Essex County Council, the local education authority, for failure to ensure her safety during the activity.
- The central issue was whether the school and the Council remained liable for her injuries when the activity was conducted by an independent contractor.

## Issues

1. Whether schools owe a non-delegable duty of care to pupils in respect of activities carried out by third parties or contractors.
2. If such a duty exists, what criteria determine its application in the context of off-site or externally managed activities.
3. Whether Essex County Council was liable for the injuries sustained by Woodland during the swimming lesson, despite having delegated the activity.

## Decision

- The Supreme Court held that Essex County Council owed a non-delegable duty of care to Woodland.
- The Court identified five criteria relevant to establishing the existence of such a duty in a school context: the vulnerability of the claimant, the assumption of responsibility by the school, control over the environment, delegation of essential functions, and the nature of the activity as central to the school's responsibilities.
- The swimming lesson was deemed an essential curricular activity, and the school had assumed responsibility for pupil safety.
- Delegation to a third-party contractor did not absolve the school of its duty to ensure reasonable care was taken.

## Legal Principles

- A non-delegable duty of care is an obligation that cannot be discharged by assigning performance to another party.
- Institutions supervising vulnerable individuals (such as children in schools) may owe such non-delegable duties, particularly regarding essential activities under their responsibility.
- The Court applied and distinguished case law including Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2001] UKHL 22 and Barrett v Enfield LBC [2001] 2 AC 550, clarifying the extension of duties to situations involving third-party contractors.
- The presence of a non-delegable duty requires vulnerability, assumption of responsibility, control, delegation of essential functions, and the essential nature of the activity.

## Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision confirmed that schools owe a non-delegable duty of care to pupils during essential activities, such as curricular swimming lessons, even if those are conducted by third-party contractors, thereby clarifying the scope of institutional liability and the continuing obligation to ensure pupil safety.


Woodland v Essex CC [2013] UKSC 66