## Facts

- On February 22, 1977, a Piper PA-31-310 aircraft suffered a mid-air breakup near Springdale, Arkansas, and crashed, killing all four occupants: Howard Reed Yowell, James Luther Ward, Jr., Jimmy Kenneth Fulkerson, and Fabe Ingram, Jr.
- The decedents’ widows and representatives (including Vicki Leigh Yowell, as widow and executrix) brought suit against Piper Aircraft Corporation for wrongful death “for the use and benefit of all persons entitled to recover,” and also asserted survival claims.
- The plaintiffs presented evidence of the decedents’ expected work life, compensation, and projected future earnings, and offered proof relevant to both pecuniary losses and nonpecuniary losses.
- After a five-week trial, the jury found Piper liable and awarded over $8 million in damages, including damages labeled as loss of inheritance and damages for loss of companionship, society, and affection; the case also involved a survival element for the decedents’ pre-impact mental anguish between the breakup and the crash.
- Piper did not challenge the jury’s liability finding on appeal; the disputes focused on damage elements, pleading sufficiency (especially for loss of inheritance), district-court jurisdiction over the survival mental-anguish claims, the propriety of a trial amendment, and prejudgment interest.
- The court of appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded for a new trial; the plaintiffs sought review in the Supreme Court of Texas.

## Issues

1. Whether loss-of-inheritance damages are recoverable in a Texas wrongful-death action and whether the plaintiffs’ pleadings were sufficient to support submission of that element.
2. Whether the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the decedents’ pre-impact mental-anguish claims asserted as survival damages, and whether allowing a trial amendment to add/clarify that element was proper.
3. Whether statutory wrongful-death beneficiaries, including parents of adult decedents, may recover damages for loss of companionship, society, and affection, and whether those damages were properly submitted.
4. Whether prejudgment interest may be awarded on the wrongful-death damages found by the jury.

## Decision

- The Supreme Court of Texas reversed the court of appeals and affirmed the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, except as to prejudgment interest.
- The court held that loss of inheritance is a recoverable element of wrongful-death damages when supported by pleadings and some evidence, and the plaintiffs’ pleadings gave sufficient notice even though they did not expressly use the phrase “loss of inheritance.”
- The court held the district court had jurisdiction over the survival claims for the decedents’ pre-impact mental anguish and that permitting a trial amendment addressing that element was within the trial court’s discretion.
- The court upheld damages for loss of companionship, society, and affection as recoverable by wrongful-death beneficiaries, including parents of adult children.
- The court denied prejudgment interest on the wrongful-death recovery because the jury’s submissions combined past damages with future, unaccrued elements (including loss of inheritance), and prejudgment interest was not available on those commingled findings.

## Legal Principles

- Loss of inheritance is a compensable component of wrongful-death pecuniary loss, measured by the present value of what the beneficiary would probably have received from the decedent’s estate had the decedent lived a normal life expectancy.
- Under Texas fair-notice pleading, a claimant need not label each damage element with exact terminology if the pleadings provide notice of the type of losses claimed and the general measure of damages sought.
- A survival claim for the decedent’s own pre-impact mental anguish is not an “incident to an estate” that deprives a district court of jurisdiction; it may be heard in district court.
- A trial court may allow a trial amendment under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 66 when it arises from the same occurrence and the opposing party does not show unfair surprise or prejudice warranting reversal.
- Wrongful-death beneficiaries may recover nonpecuniary damages for loss of companionship, society, and affection, and this recovery is available to all statutory beneficiaries, including parents of adult decedents.
- Prejudgment interest is not recoverable on jury findings that combine past damages with future, unaccrued damages such as loss of inheritance, because interest cannot be computed on unaccrued elements when they are not segregated.

## Conclusion

Yowell held that Texas wrongful-death plaintiffs may recover loss-of-inheritance damages under fair-notice pleading when supported by evidence, that district courts have jurisdiction over survival claims for pre-impact mental anguish and may permit related trial amendments, that beneficiaries (including parents of adult decedents) may recover loss-of-companionship-type damages, and that prejudgment interest was properly denied where the jury’s damage findings mixed past and future unaccrued losses.


Yowell v. Piper Aircraft Corporation, 703 S.W.2d 630 (1986)