## Facts

- On May 14, 1980, around 9:00 p.m., J.W. Bradley (age 28) was shot and killed outside the Honeydripper Cafe in Campti, Louisiana.
- The cafe was run by Aurila F. Hunter (about 65, in poor health) and her mother, Ora Edwards (about 82). They were the only employees.
- J.W. entered the cafe and asked for a Coke.
- Aurila refused to serve him because of prior problems and because she had told him not to come into the cafe.
- About two weeks earlier, after Aurila refused to sell J.W. beer, J.W. threatened her.
- Ora offered J.W. the Coke, but he refused, cursed, and threatened Aurila.
- After J.W. left the cafe, Ora went outside to check whether he had gone.
- Aurila took a revolver kept under the counter and followed Ora onto the porch.
- Aurila then saw J.W. approaching the porch while continuing threats, flailing his arms, and clenching his fists.
- Aurila pointed the gun and warned J.W. not to come closer.
- Aurila fired a warning shot; J.W. continued approaching.
- Aurila fired again, striking J.W. in the head and killing him.
- Susie Mae Bradley sued individually and on behalf of J.W.’s four minor children for wrongful-death and survival damages.
- The trial court dismissed Susie Mae’s individual wrongful-death claim after finding she was not legally married to J.W. (their relationship was concubinage), but allowed the children’s claims to proceed.
- At the bench trial, evidence was introduced about J.W.’s criminal activity and violent tendencies.
- After plaintiffs finished presenting their evidence, the trial court granted the defense motion labeled a directed verdict (treated in a non-jury case as a motion to dismiss) based on self-defense and dismissed the suit.
- The children appealed.

## Issues

1. Whether Aurila Hunter’s fatal shooting of J.W. Bradley was justified as self-defense, barring the children’s wrongful-death and survival claims.
2. Whether the trial court properly dismissed the case at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence (though styled as a directed verdict) in this non-jury trial.
3. Whether Susie Mae Bradley, as a non-spouse, stated a cause of action in her own right for wrongful death.

## Decision

- The Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit, affirmed the dismissal of the children’s wrongful-death and survival claims.
- The court held that, on the evidence presented, Aurila reasonably believed deadly force was necessary to prevent imminent serious harm to herself and her elderly mother, making self-defense a complete defense to civil liability for the shooting.
- The court upheld the trial court’s dismissal at the close of plaintiffs’ case, explaining that in a bench trial the mislabeled “directed verdict” functions as a motion to dismiss and may be granted when plaintiffs’ evidence is so weak that no reasonable fact-finder could rule for plaintiffs.
- The court also agreed with dismissal of Susie Mae Bradley’s individual wrongful-death claim because she was not legally married to the decedent and therefore had no wrongful-death cause of action in her own capacity.
- (Subsequent history: writ denied by the Louisiana Supreme Court.)

## Legal Principles

- Self-defense is a complete defense to civil liability for an intentional shooting when the defendant used force reasonably believed necessary to prevent harm.
- Deadly force may be justified when the defendant reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily injury.
- Reasonableness is determined from the circumstances as they appeared to the defendant, including the parties’ relative age and physical condition, prior threats, the aggressor’s conduct, and the defendant’s warnings and attempts to avoid using lethal force.
- Evidence of the decedent’s violent conduct and criminal history may be relevant to the reasonableness of the defendant’s fear and response when the defendant knew of that history.
- In a non-jury trial, a motion called a “directed verdict” at the close of plaintiff’s case is treated as a motion to dismiss; dismissal is proper when the plaintiff’s proof is so insubstantial that a contrary result would be unreasonable.
- Under Louisiana wrongful-death law, a person who is not a lawful spouse has no individual wrongful-death cause of action based solely on a concubinage relationship, though the decedent’s children may sue.

## Conclusion

The court affirmed dismissal of the wrongful-death and survival action because, based on plaintiffs’ own proof, Aurila Hunter’s shooting of J.W. Bradley after he threatened and advanced on two elderly women despite warnings and a warning shot was reasonable self-defense and therefore barred civil recovery, and Susie Mae Bradley had no individual wrongful-death claim because she was not J.W.’s legal spouse.


Bradley v. Hunter, 413 So. 2d 674 (1982)