Roes v. FHP, Inc., 91 Haw. 470, 985 P.2d 661 (Haw. 1999)

Facts

  • Airline baggage handlers encountered blood leaking from a specimen container shipped in luggage.
  • The handlers later learned the blood was HIV-positive and alleged they had open hand wounds at the time of contact.
  • Plaintiffs sued multiple entities involved in arranging and transporting the specimen, asserting negligence and emotional-distress claims.
  • In federal court, parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, prompting the court to certify unsettled questions of Hawaiʻi law.
  • The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court accepted certification and treated the matter as involving negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED).

Issues

  1. Whether Hawaiʻi law recognizes an NIED claim based on fear of developing AIDS when a plaintiff proves exposure to HIV-positive blood.
  2. If such a claim exists, whether damages may be based solely on emotional distress or instead require an independent physical injury.

Decision

  • Hawaiʻi law recognizes an NIED claim for fear of developing AIDS following exposure to HIV-positive blood that results in actual physical peril to the claimant.
  • Damages may be based solely on serious emotional distress even without proof of a predicate physical injury.
  • The court answered only the certified legal questions and left application of the standards to the federal court.
  • An “AIDS-phobia” claim is analyzed within NIED rather than as a separate tort.
  • For fear-of-AIDS NIED claims, liability requires exposure creating actual physical peril of HIV infection; speculative or minimal-risk fear is insufficient.
  • Serious emotional distress may be compensable without physical impact or separate physical injury when the claimant was placed in actual physical peril.
  • Certified-question decisions declare governing state-law standards without resolving disputed facts or ultimate liability.

Conclusion

Hawaiʻi recognized a limited NIED cause of action for fear of developing AIDS when exposure to HIV-positive blood places a plaintiff in actual physical peril, and it permits recovery based on serious emotional distress without requiring a separate physical injury.