## Facts

- Patricia Sieniarecki, an adult who became despondent, disoriented, and functionally immobile after hip surgeries and her husband’s death, lived with her daughter Theresa Sieniarecki.
- Patricia’s intake of food and water became severely limited; at death she was 5'3" and weighed about 68 pounds.
- After the family moved to apartments, Theresa was chosen to care for Patricia because Theresa did not work and was considered able to provide daily care.
- Theresa changed Patricia’s diapers, helped bathe her, and prepared meals, but did not seek professional advice or medical care despite Patricia’s ongoing refusal to walk and minimal eating and drinking.
- Patricia was found dead in bed; officers observed her disheveled and smeared with feces on a mattress covered with feces and urine.
- Autopsy findings included dehydration, an empty stomach, an infected foot ulcer, and sores consistent with prolonged exposure to urine and feces.
- The State prosecuted Theresa for neglect of a disabled adult under § 825.102(3), Florida Statutes (1997), based on a caregiver’s culpably negligent omission to provide essential care and services.

## Issues

1. Whether § 825.102(3) violates due process by not requiring proof of specific intent, instead criminalizing a caregiver’s culpably negligent failure or omission.
2. Whether § 825.102(3) is unconstitutionally vague because its terms (e.g., “care,” “supervision,” “services necessary,” “prudent person,” and “culpable negligence”) allegedly fail to give fair notice and invite arbitrary enforcement.

## Decision

- The Florida Supreme Court approved the district court decision and affirmed the conviction.
- The court held § 825.102(3) does not violate due process because culpable negligence supplies a constitutionally sufficient mens rea.
- The court held § 825.102(3) is not unconstitutionally vague; its terminology, read in context and coupled with culpable negligence, provides adequate notice and enforcement standards.

## Legal Principles

- Due process does not require a specific-intent element where the Legislature has supplied a meaningful criminal mens rea such as culpable negligence.
- In Florida criminal law, “culpable negligence” denotes more than ordinary negligence and is associated with gross negligence or reckless disregard for human life or safety.
- A statute is not void for vagueness if it provides (1) fair notice to persons of ordinary intelligence and (2) sufficient standards to prevent arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement.
- Common terms describing basic necessities (including food, nutrition, shelter, supervision, medicine, and medical services) and an objective “prudent person” benchmark can provide adequate definiteness, particularly when liability is limited to culpably negligent omissions by caregivers of disabled adults.

## Conclusion

The Florida Supreme Court upheld § 825.102(3) against due process and vagueness challenges, concluding that culpable negligence is an adequate mens rea and that the statute’s caregiving-duty language gives sufficient notice and enforcement guidance, thereby supporting affirmance of the neglect conviction.


Sieniarecki v. State, 756 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2000)