Abbey National Building Society v Moss [1993] 26 HLR 249

Facts

  • The property was originally owned by a mother (D) and her late husband.
  • Following her husband's death, D added her daughter as a joint tenant.
  • The daughter secured a £30,000 loan from Abbey National Building Society by forging D's signature, using the property as security.
  • The daughter defaulted on the mortgage.
  • Abbey National Building Society sought a court order for sale of the property to recover the outstanding debt.
  • The central question was whether the trust for sale's collateral purpose, specifically D's right to continue residing in the property, persisted despite the daughter's loss of beneficial interest and the fraudulent circumstances.

Issues

  1. Whether a collateral purpose, such as continued residence for D, persists after a beneficiary loses their beneficial interest.
  2. Whether the trust for sale's primary duty to sell overrides any subsisting collateral purpose, particularly in the context of fraud and subsequent claims by a mortgagee.
  3. Whether a collateral purpose can survive changes in beneficial ownership so as to restrict the trustees' power of sale.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal dismissed Abbey National Building Society's application for an order of sale.
  • It held that the collateral purpose—D’s continued right to occupy the property—survived despite the daughter's loss of beneficial interest and the fraudulent acts.
  • The court found that the trust's original intent to provide a home for D constituted a continuing collateral purpose not negated by subsequent changes in ownership or beneficiary status.
  • Reliance was placed on Jones v Challenger to affirm that collateral purposes endure if intended by the trust's creation.
  • The court distinguished Re C, noting that a collateral purpose limited to matrimonial homes may not persist in the same way.

Legal Principles

  • A trust for sale does not automatically extinguish a collateral purpose attached to the trust, such as provision of a home for a beneficiary.
  • Collateral purposes can survive changes in beneficial ownership, subject to the trust's original intent.
  • A collateral purpose may restrict trustees’ powers of sale where extinguishing it would unjustly impact a vulnerable beneficiary.
  • Actual occupation may give rise to overriding interests capable of binding purchasers or mortgagees even if unregistered.
  • Purchasers and lenders must investigate the presence of persons in actual occupation to avoid being bound by overriding interests.

Conclusion

The decision established that a trust for sale does not necessarily nullify a collateral purpose such as a beneficiary's right of residence, regardless of changes in beneficial ownership or misconduct by co-beneficiaries. The intended collateral purpose of the trust remains central in determining restrictions on the trustee’s power of sale and the enforceability of overriding interests against mortgagees.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal