Aberdeen Construction Group Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1978] STC 127, 52 TC 281 (HL)

Facts

  • Aberdeen Construction Group Ltd incurred costs preparing land for sale and sought to deduct these from capital gains under section 32(1)(b) of the Capital Gains Tax Act 1965.
  • The company argued that the expenditures increased the market value of the land.
  • The Inland Revenue Commissioners disputed whether these costs were genuinely for improving the asset's market value or were merely business-related expenses.
  • The House of Lords assessed whether the spending was primarily intended to increase the asset's value or to support the company's business activities.

Issues

  1. Whether spending by Aberdeen Construction Group Ltd qualified as an allowable deduction under section 32(1)(b) of the Capital Gains Tax Act 1965.
  2. Whether expenditure aimed at supporting business operations, which incidentally increased asset value, constitutes deductible improvement costs for capital gains tax purposes.
  3. What criteria and evidence are required to prove a direct link between the expenditure and an increase in the asset’s market value.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that only expenditure whose main purpose is to increase the market value of the asset is deductible under section 32(1)(b).
  • Costs incurred primarily for business or operational reasons, even if they incidentally raise asset value, are not deductible as improvement costs.
  • The company's development costs were found to primarily support its construction business, and the evidence provided did not sufficiently demonstrate that the primary purpose was to increase sale value.
  • Accordingly, the deduction was disallowed.

Legal Principles

  • Section 32(1)(b) permits deductions only for money spent “wholly and exclusively for improving the asset’s value.”
  • A direct and principal connection between the expenditure and an increase in the asset’s market value must be proven.
  • Incidental value increases resulting from business operations or expenses intended for business use do not satisfy the statutory requirement.
  • Maintaining thorough records that demonstrate the direct intention to increase value is necessary for claiming such deductions.

Conclusion

The House of Lords clarified that, for capital gains tax purposes, only expenditures made exclusively to increase an asset's market value are deductible under section 32(1)(b). Costs related primarily to business operations, even if they also raise value, are not deductible. Claimants must provide clear evidence of intention and purpose in spending to qualify. This decision remains a significant authority on distinguishing deductible improvement costs from non-deductible business expenses in tax law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal