Alliance & Leicester plc v Slayford [2001] EWCA Civ 1984

Facts

  • Alliance & Leicester plc, as mortgagee, sought to recover a debt secured by a legal charge granted by D1.
  • D2, D1's spouse, asserted an equitable interest in the property, claiming she did not fully understand the consequences of her consent to the legal charge.
  • D2’s assertion created an equitable defense, which prevented the lender from immediately obtaining a possession order.
  • In response, Alliance & Leicester pursued a monetary judgment against D1 based on his personal covenant in the mortgage agreement.
  • The lender subsequently considered initiating bankruptcy proceedings to recover the outstanding debt.
  • The case raised concerns over the relationships and sequencing of remedies, namely possession, monetary judgment, and bankruptcy, available to a mortgagee.

Issues

  1. Whether a mortgagee may pursue a monetary judgment and bankruptcy proceedings after being prevented from obtaining possession due to an equitable defense.
  2. Whether pursuing these alternative remedies amounts to an abuse of process.
  3. Whether possession and monetary judgment claims, as distinct remedies, may be applied concurrently or successively.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal ruled that a mortgagee is entitled to pursue alternative remedies when an equitable defense blocks possession.
  • Obtaining a monetary judgment based on a personal covenant was found to be a claim separate from a claim for possession.
  • Commencing bankruptcy proceedings after securing monetary judgment, even if it leads to an order of sale, does not constitute an abuse of process.
  • The mortgagee is not confined to a single remedy and may use all lawful remedies available until the debt has been satisfied.
  • The court affirmed a lender may pursue recovery using any lawful means in whatever order is tactically preferred.

Legal Principles

  • A mortgagee may pursue concurrent or successive remedies—such as possession, monetary judgment, and bankruptcy—until the debt is fully satisfied.
  • An equitable defense preventing possession does not prevent pursuit of monetary judgment or bankruptcy remedies against the mortgagor.
  • The claim for a monetary judgment under a personal covenant is distinct from a claim for possession; the success or failure of one does not preclude the other.
  • Commencing bankruptcy proceedings after an unsuccessful possession claim is not an abuse of process, even if it leads to the same ultimate result (sale).
  • Legal rights of the mortgagee to recover debt are not restricted by initial setbacks in enforcing security.

Conclusion

The decision in Alliance & Leicester plc v Slayford confirms that a mortgagee may seek alternative remedies—including monetary judgment and bankruptcy—when possession is barred by equitable defense, and such actions do not constitute abuse of process; each remedy is treated as a distinct means of recovery.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal