Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60, [2018] AC 355

Facts

  • Natasha Armes was placed into care as a child by Nottinghamshire County Council.
  • She alleged suffering physical and emotional harm by her placement parents over several years.
  • Armes brought a claim against the council, asserting that it was responsible for the injuries she suffered while in placement care.
  • The council denied liability, arguing it did not control the day-to-day conduct of placement parents and had complied with its legal duties via checks and assessments.
  • The Court of Appeal sided with the council, ruling the duty of care was delegable and the council was not liable for the acts of placement parents.
  • The Supreme Court subsequently reversed this outcome, holding that the council retained a non-delegable duty regarding the child's safety and well-being.

Issues

  1. Whether the local authority owed a non-delegable duty of care to a child placed in placement care.
  2. Whether Nottinghamshire County Council could be held liable for harm caused by placement parents, despite not controlling their daily actions.
  3. Whether public policy and statutory duties under the Children Act 1989 required such a non-delegable duty.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court held that Nottinghamshire County Council owed a non-delegable duty of care to children placed in placement care.
  • It determined that the duty to protect the welfare of children could not be delegated, even where another party carried out the day-to-day care.
  • The Court found that the council's statutory responsibilities and control over the arrangement established this duty.
  • The earlier view that the local authority could delegate its duty was rejected in light of the specific vulnerabilities and reliance of children in care.

Legal Principles

  • A non-delegable duty arises when one party has assumed responsibility for another's welfare, particularly when the other party is vulnerable.
  • The five-part test from Woodland v Swimming Teachers Association [2013] UKSC 66 is relevant in assessing non-delegable duties, including vulnerability, assumption of responsibility, and control over arrangements.
  • Vicarious liability is distinct from a non-delegable duty; the latter is based on obligations that cannot be shifted even where practical care is performed by others.
  • Statutory duties under the Children Act 1989 strengthen the local authority's ongoing obligation to safeguard children in its care.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's decision in Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council significantly extended the scope of non-delegable duties in public law, holding local authorities directly responsible for ensuring the safety and welfare of children placed in placement care, thereby strengthening protections for vulnerable individuals and clarifying public body accountability.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal