Facts
- Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club had previously operated pleasure flights from Blackpool Airport under licences from Blackpool Borough Council.
- Upon expiry of its licence, the Council invited bids for a new licence to operate pleasure flights.
- The Aero Club submitted a bid that complied with all stated requirements and deadlines.
- Due to an administrative error, the Aero Club’s bid was not reviewed by the Council.
- The Council awarded the licence to another party, overlooking the Aero Club’s valid tender.
Issues
- Whether a public authority is legally obliged to consider all bids that are properly submitted in accordance with the invitation to tender.
- Whether the omission to review a valid bid due to an administrative error breached the authority’s duty of fairness and honesty in public procurement.
- Whether standard wording in an invitation to tender, reserving the right to reject any or all bids, relieves the authority of the duty to review all validly submitted bids.
Decision
- The Court of Appeal held that the Council breached its duty by failing to consider the Aero Club’s properly submitted bid.
- The invitation to tender created an implied obligation for the authority to consider every valid bid received before the deadline.
- Standard reservation clauses did not permit the Council to ignore valid bids; they only allowed discretion regarding which bid to accept.
- The Council’s administrative error rendered the procurement process unfair.
Legal Principles
- Public authorities must comply with the common law duty of fairness in considering all properly submitted bids within a tender.
- The obligation exists even where the authority reserves the right not to accept any bid.
- Openness and equal treatment are fundamental in public procurement, demanding honest and unbiased review of bids.
- Effective and reliable administrative processes are essential to ensure compliance with these legal duties.
Conclusion
Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council established that public authorities are legally bound to review all validly submitted bids in a procurement process, reaffirming the principles of fairness, honesty, and equal treatment in public contracting regardless of discretionary clauses in the invitation to tender. The case remains a foundational precedent for openness and fairness in UK public procurement law.