Blakiston v Cooper (1909) 5 TC 347

Facts

  • The case involved a vicar, Mr. Blakiston, who received voluntary Easter donations from his congregation.
  • The donations were optional, not legally required.
  • Tax authorities contended that these Easter donations constituted taxable earnings, whereas Mr. Blakiston argued they were private gifts.
  • The method of collecting and distributing the donations was significant to the proceedings.

Issues

  1. Whether the voluntary Easter donations received by Mr. Blakiston should be classified as taxable earnings or as exempt personal gifts.
  2. What criteria distinguish a true gift from a taxable payment for services in the context of employment.

Decision

  • The High Court held that the Easter donations were taxable earnings.
  • The court determined the payments were related to Mr. Blakiston’s role as vicar rather than being purely private gifts.
  • It was found that donations were made in recognition of his services as vicar, not solely from personal goodwill.
  • The decision clarified the distinction between gifts and payments for services rendered as part of employment.

Legal Principles

  • Voluntary payments are taxable as earnings if they are made in connection with services performed, even absent legal compulsion.
  • The distinction between a true gift and a payment for services involves considering factors such as the frequency of payments, the nature of the relationship, and the link between payment and job duties.
  • The ruling broadened the scope of taxable earnings to include voluntary payments related to employment.
  • Subsequent cases, such as Seymour v Reed (1927) 11 TC 627, have affirmed and refined these principles, emphasizing a contextual approach.
  • The principles remain relevant in distinguishing between gifts and employment-related earnings for tax purposes.

Conclusion

Blakiston v Cooper is a landmark case in UK tax law, establishing that voluntary payments connected to employment are taxable as earnings. The ruling introduced a fact-specific approach to identifying the boundary between gifts and payments for services, a standard applied in later case law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal