Bradbury v Morgan, 1 H. & C. 249 (1862)

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Jacob, a longtime business mentor, guaranteed to pay for deliveries of specialized printing supplies to his nephew’s design studio up to £5,000. He passed away unexpectedly without providing any notice of revocation or adjustment to his guarantee. Unaware of Jacob’s death, the design studio continued ordering supplies from the printing company. When the balance exceeded £5,000, the printing company sought payment from Jacob’s estate, which refused to honor the guarantee. They cited that liability under the guarantee ended immediately upon Jacob’s death, whereas the printing company argued that it remained valid until they were informed of his passing.


Which statement best reflects the principle recognized in Bradbury v Morgan regarding ongoing liability under a guarantee after the guarantor’s death?

Introduction

Contract law defines binding agreements between parties. A central part of forming contracts is the offer, which shows clear intent to make a contract on specific terms. The impact of an offeror’s death on an offer’s validity is discussed in Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H. & C. 249. This case determines when an offer remains open for acceptance after the offeror’s death, particularly if the offeree is unaware of the death.

Offer and Acceptance: Basic Parts of Contracts

Contracts require an offer and acceptance. An offer must be clearly communicated, showing intent to be bound by its terms if accepted. Acceptance must fully agree to those terms. Bradbury v Morgan addresses how an offeror’s death affects this process.

The Facts of Bradbury v Morgan

Leigh had agreed to pay for goods supplied to his brother William Morgan up to a fixed amount. After Leigh died, the plaintiffs continued supplying goods without knowing of his death. When the limit was exceeded, they sought payment from Leigh’s executors. The executors argued the guarantee ended with Leigh’s death. The Court of Exchequer ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, stating the guarantee remained valid until they learned of Leigh’s death.

Legal Analysis in Bradbury v Morgan: Guarantees and Communication

The court distinguished continuing guarantees (which can end with death) from single-transaction guarantees (which cannot). Leigh’s guarantee was treated as continuing, so it stayed valid until the plaintiffs were informed of his death. This ruling highlights the importance of communicating changes that affect offers.

Current Applications: Ending Offers Due to Death

Later cases and debates have examined Bradbury v Morgan. Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 established that offers can end if the offeree learns facts indicating the offer is no longer valid, even without direct notice. Generally, death ends offers unless payment exists to keep the offer open (as in option contracts) or in personal service contracts. Reynolds v Atherton (1921) 125 LT 690 confirmed offers cannot be accepted after the offeree dies.

Using Bradbury v Morgan Today

While historically significant, applying Bradbury v Morgan now requires caution. Its emphasis on guarantee types and communication remains relevant. Modern law considers offer terms, revocation, and changes such as death.

Real-World Examples

If a sole business owner dies before an offer is accepted, the offer usually ends. However, in larger firms, an individual’s death might not end offers, depending on their role.

For property sales, death before acceptance typically voids the offer. But with a paid option contract, the offer might remain valid after death.

Conclusion

Bradbury v Morgan clarifies how offers end when offerors die, focusing on guarantees and communication. Later cases like Dickinson v Dodds and Reynolds v Atherton updated these rules. Lawyers must review each case’s specifics, applying Bradbury v Morgan alongside recent decisions. Clear understanding of these rules aids in solving contract disputes effectively.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal