Chahal v United Kingdom (1996) 23 EHRR 413

Facts

  • Mr. Karamjit Singh Chahal, an Indian citizen, entered the United Kingdom unlawfully in 1971 and was later granted indefinite leave to remain in 1974.
  • He became active in the Sikh community and organized protests against the Indian government.
  • The UK government alleged that Mr. Chahal was associated with a terrorist group and posed a threat to national security.
  • Despite repeated arrests for suspicion of conspiracy, no charges were brought against him.
  • The Home Secretary ordered his deportation on public interest grounds due to national security concerns.
  • Evidence was presented indicating that Mr. Chahal would face a real risk of torture or death if returned to India, based on his prominence and widespread human rights violations by Indian security forces.
  • Mr. Chahal's case reached the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) after all domestic remedies were exhausted.

Issues

  1. Whether the UK government could lawfully deport Mr. Chahal to India despite a real risk of torture, relying on national security concerns.
  2. Whether the absolute prohibition of torture under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights allowed for any exception due to an individual’s threat to national security.
  3. Whether diplomatic assurances from the Indian government were sufficient to mitigate the risk of torture.
  4. Whether the principle of non-refoulement applied in cases involving national security threats.

Decision

  • The ECtHR affirmed that Article 3 of the ECHR provides an absolute prohibition against torture, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, permitting no derogation, regardless of the individual’s conduct or status.
  • The Court found that substantial evidence existed of a real risk that Mr. Chahal would be subjected to prohibited treatment if deported to India.
  • The assurances provided by the Indian government were deemed insufficient to remove this risk.
  • The Court held that deporting Mr. Chahal to India would violate Article 3 of the ECHR.
  • It was determined that the absolute protection under Article 3 outweighs potential threats to national security.

Legal Principles

  • Article 3 of the ECHR is non-derogable; its protection applies in all circumstances, including threats to national security.
  • The principle of non-refoulement prohibits the return of individuals to countries where there is a real risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment.
  • State interests in national security do not override the fundamental rights protected by Article 3.
  • Diplomatic assurances may be insufficient if they fail to guarantee protection against prohibited treatment.

Conclusion

Chahal v United Kingdom established that states cannot deport individuals to countries where they face a real risk of torture, regardless of national security interests, reaffirming the absolute nature of Article 3 and solidifying the principle of non-refoulement within the ECHR framework.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal