Co-operative Group Ltd v Pritchard [2011] EWCA Civ 329

Facts

  • Mr. Pritchard, an employee of Co-operative Group Ltd, was assaulted by a colleague during a workplace altercation.
  • Mr. Pritchard sustained injuries and brought a claim against his employer, alleging vicarious liability for the assault.
  • The employer accepted liability for the assault but argued that Mr. Pritchard’s own conduct should reduce the damages awarded.
  • The case focused on whether the doctrine of contributory negligence applied to reduce damages in intentional tort claims such as assault.

Issues

  1. Whether contributory negligence can be applied as a defence to reduce damages in cases involving intentional torts.
  2. Whether the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 extends to intentional wrongdoing, or is limited to negligence-based claims.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that contributory negligence is not a defence to intentional torts such as assault.
  • The court determined that the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 was not intended to cover intentional torts.
  • The Act’s definition of "fault" does not extend to deliberate wrongdoing.
  • The distinction between negligence and intentional torts was reaffirmed, with intentional wrongdoers remaining fully liable for their actions.

Legal Principles

  • Contributory negligence allows reduction of damages where the claimant's negligence contributed to their loss, as established by the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945.
  • The 1945 Act applies only to negligence, breach of statutory duty, or other acts or omissions, and does not include intentional acts.
  • There is a fundamental legal and moral distinction between negligence and intentional harm; the more culpable nature of intentional wrongdoing justifies full liability.
  • Allowing contributory negligence as a defence to intentional torts would undermine deterrence and proper accountability for deliberate harm.
  • The judgment reaffirmed the separation of negligence and intentional torts in English tort law.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal in Co-operative Group Ltd v Pritchard [2011] EWCA Civ 329 definitively held that contributory negligence is not a defence to intentional torts, ensuring full liability for intentional wrongdoers and clarifying the boundaries of liability and available defences in tort law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal