Coatsworth v Johnson (1886) 54 LT 520

Facts

  • The case concerned a farm lease agreement in which Johnson (defendant) agreed to grant Coatsworth (plaintiff) a 21-year lease.
  • The lease required Coatsworth to farm the land with “reasonable care consistent with farming practices.”
  • Evidence established that Coatsworth failed to farm in a “husband-like manner” as required by the agreement.
  • The term “husband-like manner” was explained as managing the land according to standard agricultural methods of the time, as customary in farming contracts.

Issues

  1. Whether Coatsworth had fulfilled all contractual obligations, specifically farming in a “husband-like manner,” prior to the enforcement of the lease.
  2. Whether failure to satisfy this condition precedent precluded the remedy of specific performance.
  3. Whether courts may deny specific performance even where a valid contract exists if the claimant has not performed required duties.

Decision

  • Justice Kay found that Coatsworth’s breach of the farming standard constituted a failure of a key contractual term.
  • As Coatsworth had not fulfilled the condition precedent, he was denied specific performance of the lease.
  • The court confirmed that equitable relief such as specific performance requires the claimant to have fully performed their own obligations under the contract.

Legal Principles

  • Specific performance is a discretionary equitable remedy, only available when monetary damages are inadequate.
  • Conditions precedent must be met before a party can enforce contractual obligations in equity.
  • A party seeking specific performance must demonstrate complete performance of their own material obligations.
  • The decision reinforces that courts will not grant equitable remedies to parties who have not observed essential preconditions.

Conclusion

The court in Coatsworth v Johnson (1886) 54 LT 520 denied specific performance because the claimant failed to meet a condition precedent, affirming that equitable relief is unavailable to parties who have not fulfilled their own contractual obligations. The case highlights the necessity of complying fully with contractual terms, especially when seeking court-ordered enforcement in property disputes.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal