Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas plc [2015] UKSC 71

Facts

  • JKX Oil & Gas plc received requisition notices from Eclairs Group Ltd and Glengary Overseas Ltd, minority shareholders holding over 30% of JKX shares, requesting a general meeting to remove certain directors and appoint replacements.
  • The JKX board suspected these shareholders aimed to gain control of the company without paying a premium.
  • JKX directors issued restriction notices under Article 42 of the company's Articles of Association, preventing Eclairs and Glengary from voting at the meeting after the shareholders did not respond to requests for information under section 793 of the Companies Act 2006.
  • The restriction notices were based on concerns about the shareholders’ intentions and their failure to supply requested details.
  • The shareholders challenged the directors’ use of restriction notices, leading to litigation on whether the directors’ actions were for a proper purpose.

Issues

  1. Whether the JKX directors’ issuance of restriction notices under Article 42 complied with the proper purpose rule.
  2. Whether directors may use their powers primarily to affect the outcome of shareholder votes, rather than for the purposes those powers were originally granted.
  3. What tests are appropriate for determining directors’ purposes and motives under the proper purpose rule.
  4. How director discretion should be balanced against shareholder rights in the context of corporate governance.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court held that the directors had acted for an improper purpose by issuing restriction notices with the primary aim of preventing certain shareholders from voting.
  • The Court affirmed a two-step approach: first, identify the intended purpose of the relevant power; second, determine the directors’ primary motive for exercising it.
  • The rationale actually motivating the directors, rather than their formal justification, is determinative.
  • Directors may not use powers conferred for information-gathering purposes to block shareholder voting rights because they disagree with the shareholders’ objectives.
  • The restriction notices were invalid as they were aimed at influencing the outcome of the vote.
  • Directors must exercise powers only for the specific purposes for which those powers were conferred (the proper purpose rule).
  • The proper purpose test involves (1) identifying the intended purpose of the relevant power, and (2) assessing the directors’ main reason for its use.
  • The substance of directors’ motives is more important than the form or stated justification.
  • Directors’ powers must not be used to disrupt shareholder rights or to prevent shareholder resolutions they disapprove of.
  • There must be a careful balance between director authority and the fundamental rights of shareholders, particularly regarding voting and board changes.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court decision in Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas plc clarified the scope and application of the proper purpose rule in UK company law, ruling that directors cannot use their powers to control shareholder votes unless acting within their proper intended purposes, thereby reinforcing shareholder rights and setting clear standards for board conduct in corporate governance.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal