Limiting Discretion

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Ms. Delgado is a long-term tenant of the Olympia County Housing Department. She suffers from a medical condition that requires her to live in a ground-floor unit for accessibility reasons. Recently, she requested a transfer to a ground-floor unit, but her request was denied because the Housing Department has a policy that automatically denies transfer requests if any rent payments have been missed in the past year. Ms. Delgado believes that her unique medical circumstances should have been considered as an exception to the policy. She has decided to challenge the Department's approach in court, alleging that the Department's fixed policy unlawfully fetters its discretion in decision-making.


Which of the following is the best legal argument to challenge the Department's rigid policy, based on the principle of fettering discretion?

Introduction

Limiting discretion happens when administrative bodies unlawfully restrict their ability to make case-specific decisions. These powers, given by law, allow officials to apply rules based on individual situations. Limiting occurs when rigid policies block flexible judgment, resulting in decisions made without proper evaluation of each case. This rule prevents arbitrary outcomes and ensures fairness by requiring authorities to consider unique factors. Lawful administration depends on genuine assessment of all key details in a case, which limiting bypasses.

How Decision-Making Powers Operate

Administrative law gives public bodies authority to act in the public interest. These powers often include flexibility, letting officials adjust to different situations and achieve fair results. However, this flexibility must stay within legal limits and be used reasonably.

Typical Forms of Limiting

Limiting may occur through rigid policies that demand uniform outcomes regardless of case differences. Transferring decision-making to unauthorized parties or following external directives without independent analysis also restricts discretion. Similarly, fixed rules that ignore individual circumstances improperly constrain lawful choices.

Court Decisions on Limiting

  • British Oxygen Co Ltd v Minister of Technology [1971] AC 656: Courts ruled that while policies can guide decisions, exceptions must be reviewed. British Oxygen’s claim was denied under a policy excluding small items. The court concluded the Minister failed to consider the company’s total costs.

  • R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213: A health authority promised a woman lifelong care but later closed the facility. Courts decided the authority bound itself by creating expectations it could not ignore without valid reasons.

  • Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997: The Minister declined to review a complaint, claiming absolute discretion. Courts stated ministerial power must follow the law’s intent, requiring valid complaints to be examined.

Consequences of Limiting

Limiting makes decisions illegal, allowing courts to overturn them. Authorities may be told to reconsider cases properly, causing delays, expenses, and harm to their reputation. Public trust in fair decision-making weakens when individual circumstances are ignored.

Avoiding Limiting

Administrative bodies can prevent limiting by keeping policies adjustable and open to case-by-case review. Decision-makers should record how factors are evaluated and revise rules to reduce rigidity. Training staff on lawful decision-making ensures compliance with legal standards.

Connections to Other Administrative Law Principles

Limiting relates to rules like reasonable decision-making, fair hearings, and preventing bias. Fixed policies often lead to unreasonable outcomes by overlooking important details. They may also deny individuals opportunities to present their arguments or disproportionately harm specific groups.

Conclusion

Limiting discretion undermines lawful administration by enforcing fixed outcomes that disregard case-specific facts. Cases like British Oxygen, Coughlan, and Padfield show how decision-making must remain flexible and legally grounded. Authorities using policies must allow exceptions, as seen in British Oxygen. Coughlan stresses keeping commitments, while Padfield confirms discretion must align with legal purposes. Maintaining these standards stops arbitrary decisions and preserves trust in administrative fairness.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal