First National Bank plc v Achampong [2003] EWCA Civ 487

Facts

  • The case concerned a mortgage over co-owned property, with only one co-owner guaranteeing the loan.
  • The lender, First National Bank plc, sought to enforce its security interest after default on loan payments.
  • The defendant co-owners included both the borrowing party and a non-borrowing party.
  • The guarantor agreed to repay the loan if the main borrower defaulted, but was also a co-owner of the property.

Issues

  1. Whether a secured creditor could enforce a mortgage against the entire co-owned property when only one co-owner guaranteed the loan.
  2. To what extent the lender could claim against the interests of non-borrowing co-owners.
  3. The scope of a guarantor’s liability and whether the lender must first attempt to recover from the main borrower before seeking payment from the guarantor’s property share.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held the lender could enforce the mortgage only against the guarantor’s (borrowing co-owner's) share of the property, not the interests of non-borrowing co-owners.
  • Lenders must separate joint and individual responsibilities in cases involving co-owned property.
  • The lender can seek payment from the guarantor’s share only after attempting to recover from the primary borrower.
  • The interests of non-borrowing co-owners are protected and cannot be unfairly affected by another co-owner’s default.

Legal Principles

  • A secured creditor’s interest attaches to the named property and is limited to the defaulting (borrowing) co-owner’s share where the charge is not over the entire property.
  • Guarantors are only secondarily liable, and a lender must first pursue remedies against the principal debtor.
  • Non-borrowing co-owners are shielded from enforcement unless they are parties to the mortgage.
  • Mortgage agreements over co-owned property must reflect the intent to charge all shares, or else recovery is restricted to the borrower’s portion.
  • Principles from cases such as Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland [1981] AC 487 and City of London Building Society v Flegg [1988] AC 54 support protection of non-borrowing co-owners.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal clarified that secured creditors may enforce their rights only against the borrowing co-owner’s share in co-owned property and must exhaust remedies against primary borrowers before proceeding against guarantors, thereby safeguarding non-borrowing co-owners and upholding the principle of secondary liability for guarantors.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal