## Facts

- The case involved a dispute over beneficial ownership of a property following the breakdown of a relationship.
- One party had made most of the mortgage payments, prompting questions about the impact of these payments on ownership shares.
- Both parties had entered into the property with some form of understanding or agreement regarding ownership, but the clarity and details of this agreement were disputed.
- Issues arose about how to account for both initial purchase contributions (such as deposits) and ongoing financial inputs, including those toward upkeep and maintenance.

## Issues

1. Whether mortgage payments alone entitle the payer to a greater beneficial interest in the property.
2. How initial agreements, ongoing contributions, and shared intentions should be weighed in determining each party’s beneficial share.
3. Whether, in the absence of express agreement, the court can infer or impute intentions regarding ownership shares based on conduct and fairness.

## Decision

- The Court of Appeal held that making mortgage payments indicates an intention to acquire ownership but does not automatically fix the ownership percentage.
- Ownership shares must be established by a comprehensive analysis of all relevant factors, including initial agreements, purpose of purchase, and subsequent financial conduct.
- The court may infer intentions from evidence of contributions and conduct but will not create an agreement where none exists.
- Resulting or constructive trusts may be found where contributions and intentions support such an outcome.
- The judgment establishes the need to review all evidence rather than assign shares strictly according to mortgage payments.

## Legal Principles

- Mortgage payments are evidence of an intention to own but are not solely determinative of beneficial interest.
- Courts must consider initial understandings, purpose behind the purchase, and subsequent financial conduct, including upkeep, in assessing ownership proportions.
- Where explicit agreement is lacking, courts may infer intentions from the parties’ conduct and contributions, aiming for equitable outcomes.
- Documentation and clear records of agreements and contributions significantly assist in resolving disputes about property ownership.

## Conclusion

French v Barcham [2008] 1 WLR 1124 set out a structured method for determining beneficial interests in jointly owned property where mortgages are involved, requiring courts to analyze all contributions and shared intentions to achieve equitable property divisions in trust disputes.