HMRC v PGMO, [2021] EWCA Civ 1370

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Morgan is a freelance tennis umpire occasionally hired by the National Tennis Supervisory Association (NTSA) to officiate high-level matches. Under their contract, Morgan can decline specific matches without penalty and is free to accept other officiating opportunities independently. The NTSA provides training and uniform guidelines to maintain consistent standards, and officials are subject to performance reviews. However, there is no ongoing obligation for the NTSA to provide Morgan with a minimum number of matches each season. In rare circumstances, Morgan is permitted to find a qualified replacement if a scheduling conflict arises.


Which factor best indicates that Morgan is likely to be categorized as self-employed for tax purposes?

Introduction

Deciding employment status is an important part of tax law. This depends on the relationship between the organization and the worker. Factors like control over tasks, continuous obligations between parties, and whether the worker must perform tasks themselves are relevant. HMRC v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 1370 deals with the employment status of referees in professional football for tax purposes. The Court of Appeal’s decision adds to the legal understanding of these rules in sports.

The Facts of HMRC v PGMOL

The case centered on Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), which manages referees for English professional football leagues. HMRC claimed referees under PGMOL contracts should be classified as employees for tax, impacting National Insurance and income tax. PGMOL argued referees were self-employed.

Control and Continuous Obligations

The Court of Appeal assessed control (how PGMOL directed referees’ work) and continuous obligations (duties between parties over time). It reviewed PGMOL’s training, evaluations, and disciplinary measures. The court also checked whether referees had responsibilities beyond individual matches.

Personal Work and Replacements

The requirement for referees to perform tasks themselves, without sending others, was reviewed. The court analyzed contract terms on referee availability and substitution rules. The option for substitutions, though uncommon, influenced the outcome.

The Court of Appeal's Decision

The Court of Appeal upheld prior rulings that referees were not employees. It highlighted limited obligations between matches. While PGMOL controlled referees during games, the lack of guaranteed work outside match assignments supported self-employed status. Substitution clauses, though rarely used, were permitted in contracts.

Impact of the Ruling

This case clarifies how employment status tests apply in professional sports. It emphasizes reviewing the entire working relationship, not just control during matches. The judgment aids in cases with irregular schedules, common in project-based roles. It provides an important example for sports and event-related industries.

Conclusion

HMRC v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 1370 evaluates employment status factors like control, continuous obligations, and personal work. The court’s focus on limited responsibilities outside matches contributes to legal discussions on modern work arrangements. This assists organizations and workers in determining tax status in project-based roles. The principles here will inform future cases in similar contexts.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal