Iswera v Commissioner of Tax, Trinidad and Tobago [1965] 1 WLR 663 (PC)

Facts

  • The appellant, Iswera, purchased a large plot of land in Trinidad and Tobago.
  • She subdivided the land into smaller lots and sold them over time, generating significant profit.
  • The Commissioner of Tax argued that these profits were taxable income under the Income Tax Ordinance.
  • Iswera contended that her profit constituted a capital gain, asserting it was not derived from regular business activity.
  • There was a dispute about whether the process of subdivision and subsequent sale was simply the realization of a capital asset or amounted to trading as a business.

Issues

  1. Whether the profit from the subdivision and sale of land constituted taxable income or a capital gain.
  2. Whether Iswera's main purpose in acquiring the property was for trading (business) or as a long-term investment.
  3. Which factors should be considered when determining the nature of the gain from property transactions.

Decision

  • The Privy Council determined that Iswera’s main purpose for acquiring the land was not to conduct a land development business, but to benefit from its appreciation.
  • It was held that planning to sell for profit does not automatically make a gain taxable as income.
  • The single transaction and the handling of the asset indicated the profit was a capital gain rather than the proceeds of a trading activity.
  • Thus, the profit realized from selling the subdivided lots was not subject to income tax.

Legal Principles

  • The main purpose for acquiring an asset is important in determining tax liability on profit from its sale.
  • Profits do not become taxable income simply because the owner intended to sell at a profit; the distinction between investment (capital) and trading (business) must be assessed on all facts.
  • Relevant factors include nature of the asset, length of ownership, frequency of similar transactions, and the method of acquisition and sale.
  • Courts favor a thorough factual analysis over rigid application of profit motive tests.

Conclusion

The Privy Council’s decision in Iswera v CTT clarified that the main purpose behind property acquisition is central for tax characterization; merely intending to profit by sale does not make such profit taxable income, solidifying the importance of detailed factual analysis in distinguishing capital gains from business profits.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal