Jones v Morgan [2001] EWCA Civ 995

Facts

  • Mr. Jones mortgaged his property to Mr. Morgan as security for a loan.
  • The mortgage agreement included a clause granting Mr. Morgan an option to purchase the property at a fixed price, exercisable at any time after the loan was repaid.
  • Mr. Jones argued that this clause constituted an impermissible clog on his equity of redemption and was therefore unenforceable.
  • The trial court had ruled in favour of Mr. Morgan, upholding the validity of the option clause.
  • Mr. Jones appealed to the Court of Appeal, challenging the clause as an undue restraint on redemption.

Issues

  1. Whether the option clause allowing the mortgagee to purchase the property after repayment was a void clog on the equity of redemption.
  2. Whether such a clause unfairly restrained the mortgagor’s right to redeem free of unreasonable conditions.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that the option clause was a void clog on the equity of redemption.
  • The clause granted Mr. Morgan a significant and ongoing advantage by enabling the purchase of the property at a fixed price, regardless of its market value, even after redemption.
  • The option was not necessary to protect the mortgagee’s legitimate interests.
  • Any term that imposes an unreasonable or perpetual restraint on the mortgagor’s right to redeem is unenforceable.
  • The judgment clarified that such post-redemption options are void unless they can be justified as reasonable and necessary.
  • The equity of redemption gives the mortgagor the right to regain title to the property upon repayment and must not be fettered by unreasonable restraints.
  • Any term in a mortgage agreement that unduly restricts the right to redeem (a clog) is void unless reasonable and necessary to protect the security interest of the mortgagee.
  • Post-redemption options in favour of the mortgagee are closely scrutinized for fairness and balance between the parties’ interests.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal affirmed that a mortgagor’s right to redeem must remain unfettered, holding that post-redemption purchase options that operate as unreasonable restraints are void, thereby reinforcing equitable protection for mortgagors in mortgage transactions.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal