Land Law in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Julia recently moved into a countryside cottage that her friend Henry inherited from his late uncle but never registered with HM Land Registry. She agreed to pay a monthly sum for her exclusive use of the cottage for one year, relying solely on an oral agreement instead of a formal deed. Midway through her stay, Henry decides to sell the property, prompting the prospective buyer to claim that Julia’s arrangement is not binding. Julia, however, contends that the arrangement constitutes a valid lease, owing to her exclusive possession for a fixed term. She seeks advice on whether her rights will be enforceable against the buyer, given that the land remains unregistered.


Which of the following statements best describes Julia's interest in the unregistered cottage and its enforceability?

Introduction

Land law in the UK comprises the legal rules and principles that govern the rights and obligations associated with land ownership, use, and transfer. It is a complex area, underpinned by historical common law concepts and modern statutory interventions. At its core, land law establishes how individuals and entities can acquire, possess, and dispose of interests in land, as well as the legal relationship between landowners and other parties. Key requirements within this area of law include understanding property rights, easements, covenants, and mortgages. This article will provide a broad overview of the technical aspects of land law in the UK, citing relevant cases and legislation where appropriate.

The Nature of Land and Estates

The legal definition of land is extensive, encompassing not only the physical ground but also anything permanently attached to it, such as buildings and fixtures. The Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) significantly streamlined the types of legal estates that can exist in land to two main categories: the fee simple absolute in possession, representing the closest to full ownership, and the term of years absolute, which is a leasehold interest. All other forms of ownership or interest now take effect as equitable interests. The concepts of freehold and leasehold remain critical for understanding the basis of property ownership.

A freehold estate represents ownership of the land for an indefinite duration, while a leasehold estate grants the right to possess land for a specific period, as confirmed in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809 . In Street v Mountford , Lord Templeman clarified that a lease must confer exclusive possession for a term at a rent. This case remains pivotal for defining the characteristics that distinguish a lease from a licence, which only confers a personal right to occupy land, lacking the proprietary dimension of a lease.

Legal and Equitable Interests in Land

The LPA 1925 made a fundamental distinction between legal and equitable interests in land, partly to simplify the conveyancing process and protect buyers of land. Legal interests are those that are created or transferred by deed, a formal legal document which must comply with certain requirements such as being signed, witnessed and delivered. Key legal interests include easements (rights of way) and mortgages.

Equitable interests, on the other hand, are those interests that were historically recognised by the Court of Chancery which existed before the current unified court system was created by the Supreme Court Act 1981. They are usually created informally in writing but not by deed, or where a person has contributed directly to the purchase price of a property without being recognised as a legal owner. It is essential to note that if an interest has not been created by a legal deed then it has to take effect as an equitable right. The law in relation to land, through operation of the Land Registration Act 2002, has tried to shift away from such a system of dual recognition by attempting to make all title to land a fully registered title, which is governed solely by the register, but it has not eliminated all equitable interests. They may arise as a result of a trust of land where the legal ownership is divided from the beneficial interest, whereby the legal owners are the trustees of the land, and the beneficiaries have rights against them to have the terms of the trust upheld.

Registered and Unregistered Land

Land ownership in England and Wales is governed by two parallel systems, relating to whether the title to the land is registered.

Registered land involves land where the title to the property has been registered in a register maintained by HM Land Registry. It is intended to provide purchasers with an easy means of ascertaining all legal and equitable interest in land, and the identity of the legal owners. In order to be protected against any subsequent purchaser, the land must be entered onto the register in accordance with the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002), which now makes registration compulsory in all parts of England and Wales. However, there are certain overriding interests listed in the LRA 2002 Schedule 3 that will bind a subsequent purchaser even if they are not registered. Examples of these overriding interests include leases, interests of those in actual occupation, and legal easements.

Unregistered land is an increasingly small area of land, though some land is still held under an antiquated system of paper-based, title-based registration. This is where one can prove ownership by presenting the title deeds of the land going back at least 15 years. For unregistered land, it is necessary to investigate all title deeds to a property from the previous 15 years and check the Land Charges Registry, maintained by HM Land Registry for any adverse charges. Land Charges Act 1972 lists certain registrable interests. If an equitable interest is in the list and not registered, then a subsequent purchaser in good faith of a legal estate for value will not be bound by the right. This protection against equitable interests does not extend to overriding interests or legal estates, which would bind all prospective purchasers.

Easements, Covenants, and Mortgages

Easements are rights to use land owned by someone else, for example, rights of way and rights to light. A legal easement requires being granted by deed, whereas a prescriptive right may exist via the doctrine of prescription. For instance, where a right has been used ‘as of right’, for more than 20 years; ‘as of right’ indicates a clear knowledge and use of a certain practice which has been enjoyed peaceably and consistently and has been used without secrecy, force or permission as decided in Dalton v Angus [1881] 6 App Cas 740 .

Covenants are contractual promises made by owners of land in favour of other land owners, which are either positive or restrictive. A positive covenant requires performance of some act (usually financial) whereas restrictive covenants restrict activities on land. Covenants can be “appurtenant” to the land itself and therefore run with the land and bind later buyers. The case of Tulk v Moxhay [1848] 2 Ph 774 , establishes that restrictive covenants can bind subsequent purchasers with the intention to restrain certain land usage.

Mortgages represent the lending of money with security over a property, usually done through the creation of a charge. The mortgagee has the right to take possession of the land in the event of mortgage default, and to then sell the property to recover any outstanding loan amount. The legal mechanisms for these operations are governed by sections 101-103 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

Recent Developments and Reforms

The Land Registration Act 2002 sought to reform aspects of unregistered land by promoting greater transparency and simplicity of the law. Most recent cases have focused upon the interpretation of overriding interests, highlighting the potential weaknesses in the registered land system.

In
Stock v Barrs (2020) [2020] EWCA Civ 1539, the Court of Appeal had to consider whether an individual had an overriding interest over a property which he had been living in as a lodger, and whether that status could amount to a proprietary interest. The court ruled that a lodger does not have sufficient rights, therefore the right was not an overriding interest under Schedule 3 of the LRA 2002. The court’s decision demonstrates the need for actual occupation, as per the statutory definition of overriding interests in schedule 3 paragraph 2 of the LRA 2002, in order to trigger that protection and the inability to rely merely on a proprietary claim to protect occupier rights, which must be linked to the land.

Conclusion

In conclusion, land law is a diverse and complex area which is constantly evolving. Although this article has briefly touched upon many of its core principles, a deeper study in this area would benefit from further knowledge of specific issues such as: trusts of land, conveyancing, mortgages, planning regulations, and proprietary estoppel. It is by this approach that you will develop the knowledge necessary to understand the framework and its real-world application. The recent legislative reforms and judicial decisions indicate a continued effort to modernise and simplify the law, while acknowledging the importance of preserving individual rights and commercial realities.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal