## Facts

- The case concerned the compatibility of national procedural rules, specifically time limits for bringing legal actions, with effective judicial protection of EU law rights.
- Levez questioned whether a national limitation period undermined the ability to enforce rights conferred by EU law.
- The European Court of Justice (ECJ) examined national courts’ obligations regarding the interplay between national time limits and the requirement to ensure EU rights are fully effective.
- The dispute highlighted the balance between Member States’ procedural autonomy and the supremacy of EU law.

## Issues

1. Whether national limitation periods can lawfully restrict the ability to bring actions based on EU law rights.
2. Whether national time limits for enforcing EU rights comply with the principles of equivalence (no less favourable than similar national claims) and effectiveness (not to make enforcement impossible or excessively difficult).
3. What obligations national courts have when national procedural rules risk undermining EU law rights.

## Decision

- The ECJ held that Member States retain the right to set national procedural rules, including limitation periods.
- However, such time limits must not render the exercise of rights conferred by EU law practically impossible or excessively difficult.
- The Court emphasized that national procedural rules must comply with both the principles of equivalence and effectiveness.
- National courts are required to scrutinize whether national time limits unduly impede the effective enforcement of EU law rights.
- Where a time limit unjustly restricts access to redress for breaches of EU law, courts may be required to disapply the national rule.

## Legal Principles

- The principle of effective judicial protection obliges national courts to safeguard the full and effective enforcement of EU rights.
- The principle of equivalence requires that conditions for actions based on EU law must not be less favourable than for similar national actions.
- The principle of effectiveness prohibits national rules from making the enforcement of EU law rights impossible or excessively difficult.
- National procedural autonomy is limited where it conflicts with the supremacy and uniform application of EU law.

## Conclusion

The ECJ’s judgment in Levez confirms that national limitation periods must not undermine EU law rights; national courts must ensure both equivalence and effectiveness when applying procedural rules, thereby guaranteeing individuals the effective judicial protection of EU law across Member States.

Levez v Jennings (Harlow Pools) Ltd (Case C-326/96) [1998] ECR I-7835