Lewis v Lady Rook, [1992] STC 171

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Amy purchased a nineteenth-century townhouse with the intention of making it her family's primary residence. The property was in dire need of extensive structural and cosmetic renovations before it could be safely occupied. Amy spent three months arranging for contractors to repair critical electrical and plumbing issues. She moved into the townhouse immediately after the renovations were finished and lived there for one year. Upon selling the townhouse, Amy included the entire period from purchase to sale in her PRR claim.


Which of the following statements best reflects the correct tax treatment for the months prior to Amy's actual occupation?

Introduction

Principal residence relief (PRR) is a part of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rules in the United Kingdom. This relief removes taxes on gains from selling a home used as the taxpayer’s main dwelling. Lewis v Lady Rook [1992] STC 171, an important case in the Court of Appeal, defined how "residence" is understood for time before and after occupying a property. The case set out rules about how long and for what reasons such periods qualify for PRR, affecting later CGT decisions. This ruling helps identify which factors matter when using PRR.

The Facts of Lewis v Lady Rook

Lady Rook bought a property in 1982 to live in as her main dwelling. Significant repairs were needed before she could occupy it. These repairs took months, delaying her move. When she sold the property, tax authorities challenged her PRR claim for the time before she moved in. This led to legal action in the High Court and Court of Appeal.

The High Court Decision

The High Court initially sided with the tax authorities, stating physical occupation was required for PRR. The court limited "residence" to mean actual presence. This raised questions about delays such as repairs before moving in.

The Court of Appeal's Reversal

The Court of Appeal overturned the High Court’s decision. Lord Justice Nourse ruled physical occupation is not always necessary for PRR. The court expanded "residence" to include time before and after occupation if directly connected to using the property as a main dwelling. This broadened PRR’s application.

The "Purpose Test"

The Court of Appeal established the "purpose test" from this case. This test reviews the taxpayer’s intentions and actions related to the property. If delays before or after occupation are clearly for making or keeping the property as a main dwelling, PRR applies. For Lady Rook, repairs before moving in were seen as essential to make the home usable, so that period met PRR conditions.

Applying the "Purpose Test": Examples and Limits

The "purpose test" helps assess different situations. For example, if someone buys a home and takes time renovating it before moving in, that period may qualify for PRR. Likewise, time spent selling the home after moving out might count.

However, there are limits. Renting the property during claimed pre- or post-occupation periods lowers PRR claims, as it shows a different use. Long delays without clear reasons tied to home use can also disqualify PRR.

Effect of Lewis v Lady Rook on Later Cases

Lewis v Lady Rook shaped many later PRR disputes. It made the "purpose test" a central guideline. In Goodwin v Curtis [1998] STC 370, courts used this test to deny PRR when the owner briefly lived in a home then rented it out. The court noted the owner’s actions changed the property’s primary use.

Practical Steps for Taxpayers

This case offers direct guidance for PRR claims. Keeping detailed records about reasons and lengths of delays is important. Documents like repair contracts, invoices, or sale records help support claims. Understanding the "purpose test" allows taxpayers to determine if their PRR claim is valid and avoids disputes with tax authorities.

Conclusion

Lewis v Lady Rook [1992] STC 171 is a significant ruling for principal residence relief. The Court of Appeal expanded "residence" beyond physical occupation. The "purpose test" provided a practical method to evaluate PRR claims. This case guides later legal outcomes and assists taxpayers in following CGT rules for main homes. By applying this case’s principles, taxpayers can correctly claim PRR benefits under UK tax law. The decision shows how legal rules and real-world situations impact tax outcomes.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal