## Facts

- Travelers occupied land owned by South Gloucestershire Council.
- The travelers repeatedly trespassed onto neighboring farmland owned by the claimants, causing damage and disruption.
- The council, as the landlord, was alleged to have allowed its licensees (the travelers) to commit acts of nuisance and trespass against the claimants.
- The council claimed it had no control over the travelers' actions and thus disclaimed responsibility.
- The court found the council had knowledge of the travelers' activities and did not take adequate steps to prevent the resulting harm to the claimants.

## Issues

1. Whether a landlord can be held liable for trespass or nuisance committed by its tenants or licensees.
2. Whether knowledge of the nuisance or trespass and failure to act are sufficient to establish liability for the landlord.
3. Whether the council’s lack of direct involvement excused it from responsibility.

## Decision

- The Court of Appeal held that a landlord may be liable for nuisance or trespass by tenants or licensees if the landlord has knowledge of the activities and fails to take reasonable steps to prevent the harm.
- The council’s knowledge of the travelers’ conduct and its failure to act were sufficient to establish liability.
- The fact that the council was not directly involved in the wrongdoing did not absolve it of legal responsibility.

## Legal Principles

- Landlords can be liable for the actions of tenants or licensees under the principles of occupiers' liability.
- Liability hinges on the landlord having knowledge (actual or constructive) of the wrongful acts and failing to take reasonable measures to prevent the harm.
- The duty on property owners extends to ensuring their land is not used to harm others.
- Foreseeability of harm and the ability to take steps to prevent it are critical in establishing liability.
- Property rights do not extend to permitting the use of land in a way that causes harm to third parties.

## Conclusion

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire CC established that landlords may be liable for nuisance or trespass committed by their tenants or licensees if they have knowledge of those activities and fail to take reasonable preventative action, emphasizing the need for proactive management by property owners to prevent harm to others.

Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire CC [1999] 3 WLR 137