Madoff Securities International Ltd v Raven [2013] EWHC 3147 (Comm)

Facts

  • Madoff Securities International Ltd was a company connected to the Bernard Madoff fraud scheme.
  • The actions of its directors were scrutinized to assess compliance with the duty of care, skill, and diligence as required by section 174 of the Companies Act 2006.
  • The case arose in the context of evaluating the directors' role and conduct within the company amidst the backdrop of large-scale fraudulent activities.

Issues

  1. What is the proper interpretation and application of the objective and subjective standards for directors' duty of care, skill, and diligence under section 174 of the Companies Act 2006?
  2. How should a director's general and individual knowledge, skill, and experience be weighed in assessing breaches of duty?
  3. What are the practical implications for directors’ participation and decision-making in light of these standards?

Decision

  • The court affirmed that section 174 of the Companies Act 2006 incorporates both an objective test (general standard expected of a director) and a subjective test (standard based on the individual director's actual knowledge and experience).
  • The directors’ conduct was evaluated against both the statutory general minimum (objective) and their particular specialized knowledge or qualifications (subjective).
  • The judgment highlighted the necessity for directors to participate actively in company affairs and make independent judgments, particularly under challenging circumstances.
  • It reinforced that directors who do not maintain the required care, skill, and diligence are at risk of breaching their duties.

Legal Principles

  • Section 174(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2006 sets an objective standard for directors’ care, skill, and diligence, requiring conduct in line with what is generally expected of any director in that role.
  • Section 174(2)(b) introduces a subjective element, adjusting the expected standard to account for a director’s specific knowledge, skills, and experience.
  • Earlier cases such as Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co Ltd [1925] Ch 407 and Dorchester Finance Co Ltd v Stebbing [1989] BCLC 498 provided historical context for these standards.
  • The court in this case clarified that objective and subjective tests must be applied together to assess whether a director has fulfilled their legal obligations.
  • The judgment emphasized the ongoing obligation for directors to maintain competence, act independently, and ensure the effectiveness of internal controls.

Conclusion

The court in Madoff Securities International Ltd v Raven provided essential clarification of the objective and subjective elements of directors’ duties under section 174 of the Companies Act 2006, confirming the dual assessment of director competence and reinforcing the need for directors to fully understand and continually uphold their responsibilities within corporate governance.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal