Mairs v Haughey [1994] 1 AC 303

Facts

  • Shipyard workers in Northern Ireland received redundancy payments following the closure of their workplace.
  • The payments exceeded statutory minimums and were the result of agreements between the employer and trade unions.
  • Tax authorities argued these payments constituted taxable income under Schedule E as employment income.
  • Mr. Mairs, on behalf of the workers, contended that the payments compensated for the loss of employment and were not subject to Schedule E taxation.

Issues

  1. Whether redundancy payments made upon termination of employment, and exceeding statutory requirements, should be taxed as income from employment under Schedule E.
  2. Whether the payments represented compensation for job loss or constituted rewards for past services.

Decision

  • The House of Lords unanimously determined that the redundancy payments were not taxable as employment income under Schedule E.
  • The Court distinguished between payments for loss of employment and payments for services rendered during employment.
  • The redundancy payments were found to compensate for the loss of job, not as remuneration for past employment services.
  • The payments, originating from union-negotiated agreements, were regarded as separate from contractual employment earnings.

Legal Principles

  • The classification of payments for tax purposes depends on their purpose and connection to employment: compensation for loss of job is not employment income.
  • Under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, and Schedule E, only payments for past or current services qualify as taxable employment income.
  • Redundancy or severance payments compensating for the termination of employment, specifically from union or redundancy agreements, are excluded from Schedule E taxation when not related to past services.
  • The intended purpose and context of the payment, including circumstances and source, are significant in determining tax liability.

Conclusion

Mairs v Haughey [1994] 1 AC 303 clarified that redundancy payments compensating employees for the loss of their jobs, especially when arranged through union agreements and not made for past service, fall outside the scope of Schedule E employment income and are not taxable as such. The decision established important factors for distinguishing between taxable and non-taxable severance payments in employment tax law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal