Malone v Laskey [1907] 2 KB 141

Facts

  • The claimant resided in a property owned by her husband's employer.
  • Her husband was a tenant of the premises, holding a leasehold interest.
  • The claimant occupied the property solely by virtue of her husband's lease, making her a licensee and not a tenant or owner.
  • During her occupancy, a cistern in the lavatory fell due to vibrations caused by the neighboring defendant’s electricity generator.
  • The falling cistern injured the claimant, who then sought to sue the neighbor for nuisance, alleging that the generator’s vibrations were the cause.
  • The key question was whether the claimant, as a licensee without a legal or proprietary interest in the land, could bring an action in nuisance.

Issues

  1. Whether a licensee, without possessory or proprietary interest in land, has legal standing to bring a claim in private nuisance.
  2. Whether the claimant's status as a mere licensee derived from her husband's tenancy sufficed to confer a legal ‘interest’ in land for the purpose of a nuisance claim.
  3. Whether a license in itself constitutes an adequate 'interest' to support a claim for interference with land under nuisance law.

Decision

  • The court held that the claimant, as a mere licensee, did not possess a sufficient proprietary or possessory interest in the property to bring a nuisance claim.
  • It was determined that standing in nuisance is reserved for those with a demonstrable legal interest in the affected land, such as tenants or owners.
  • The claimant's presence on the property via her husband's tenancy did not confer the required legal rights to bring proceedings in nuisance.
  • The claim was dismissed on the basis of lack of legal standing.

Legal Principles

  • A claimant in private nuisance must hold a proprietary or possessory interest in the land allegedly affected by nuisance.
  • A mere license to occupy property, without legal or equitable ownership or a leasehold interest, is insufficient to establish standing in nuisance.
  • Nuisance is a tort relating to land and the right to sue is linked to a demonstrable legal interest in that land.

Conclusion

Malone v Laskey [1907] 2 KB 141 established that only those with a legal or equitable proprietary interest or possessory right in affected land may bring a private nuisance claim; mere licensees are excluded, a principle that shaped the law until later cases reconsidered the scope of standing in nuisance claims.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal