Moore v Griffiths [1972] 1 WLR 1024

Facts

  • Bobby Moore captained the England football team to victory in the 1966 World Cup.
  • The Football Association made a £1,000 ex gratia payment to each member of the victorious team.
  • The Inland Revenue contended that the payment constituted taxable income under Moore’s employment.
  • Moore argued the payment was a non-taxable gift, honoring exceptional, non-contractual achievement rather than his routine employment duties.

Issues

  1. Whether the ex gratia payment to Moore constituted taxable income arising from his employment.
  2. Whether the payment was given for services rendered under Moore’s contract or as a non-contractual gesture recognizing an exceptional national achievement.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal determined the payment was not taxable income.
  • The Court emphasized the unique and exceptional nature of the achievement for which the payment was made.
  • It was held that the payment was intended as a gesture of public recognition, not as remuneration for services under the employment contract.
  • The Court concluded the payment fell outside Moore’s normal employment duties.

Legal Principles

  • An ex gratia payment made for an achievement of unique or national significance, and not as compensation for contractual services, is not taxable as employment income.
  • The Court distinguishes payments that are routine or linked directly to job performance (which may be taxable, as in Laidler v Perry [1965] 2 All ER 121) from extraordinary, goodwill gestures.
  • The purpose, context, and employer’s intent are critical for determining if a payment is taxable.
  • Documentation of the purpose and basis for ex gratia payments can be important in clarifying tax obligations and distinguishing such payments from contractual or routine compensation (see also Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hambrook [1956] 3 All ER 338).

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal in Moore v Griffiths established that ex gratia payments recognizing exceptional accomplishments, unconnected to an employee’s contractual obligations or routine performance, are not subject to income tax; the decision clarifies the distinction between taxable compensation and genuine gestures of goodwill in employment law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal