Moorhouse v Dooland [1955] Ch 284

Facts

  • Mr. Dooland, a professional cricketer, received money gathered during cricket matches.
  • The collections were organized by the club and distributed to players through a fixed system related to their performance.
  • The Inland Revenue contended these collections represented taxable income, whereas Mr. Dooland argued they were voluntary gifts not arising out of his employment.
  • The dispute centered on the method and frequency of collections, as well as the nature of the distribution system.

Issues

  1. Whether payments collected and distributed by the employer, though labeled voluntary, constitute taxable income or non-taxable gifts.
  2. How the method and regularity of collection and the employer’s involvement affect the tax status of such payments.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that the collections, though referred to as voluntary donations, formed part of Mr. Dooland's employment income.
  • The organized collection process, predetermined distribution method, and the expectation that players would receive these payments were key factors in this determination.
  • The court concluded that it is the manner and context of payment management, not merely its source, that governs tax liability.

Legal Principles

  • Payments expected by employees and received as a regular feature of employment, even when from third parties, are taxable as employment income.
  • The distinction between taxable income and personal gifts depends on factors such as regularity of payment, employer involvement in collection/distribution, and the purpose connected to job performance.
  • True voluntary gifts, given as acts of personal goodwill with no expectation or connection to employment duties, are less likely to be taxed, whereas routine, organized payments arising from employment are likely to be treated as earnings.
  • Subsequent case law and HMRC guidance have reinforced the importance of examining the specific context and facts of such payments.

Conclusion

Moorhouse v Dooland [1955] Ch 284 affirms that the organized and regular receipt of payments tied to employment duties constitutes taxable income, clarifying the legal distinction between gifts and earnings for income tax purposes. The case remains influential in guiding both employers and employees on the tax treatment of gratuities, tips, and similar payments.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal