Morgan v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 181 (TC)

Facts

  • The case concerned whether Mr. Morgan’s property qualified as his main home for the purposes of Capital Gains Tax (CGT).
  • The First-tier Tribunal reviewed the practical and factual circumstances of Mr. Morgan’s use of the property.
  • Factors examined included the duration and frequency of stays at the property, utility usage, presence of furniture, access to essential services, and proximity to family and work.
  • Documentary evidence, such as utility bills, council tax records, bank statements, and mail addressed to the property, was considered to support the claim of main home status.
  • The tribunal referenced established HMRC guidance and prior legal decisions, such as Goodwin v Curtis, to inform its findings.

Issues

  1. Whether Mr. Morgan’s property qualified as his main home for the purposes of Capital Gains Tax.
  2. What factual indicators and evidence are determinative in establishing a taxpayer’s main home for Principal Private Residence (PRR) relief.
  3. The role of stated intention versus documented evidence in deciding main home status.

Decision

  • The tribunal concluded that no single factor is determinative; the outcome depends on a balanced assessment of relevant factual circumstances.
  • Regular and extended stays, consistent use of utilities, and presence of essential amenities supported the claim of main home.
  • Written, documentary evidence was deemed critical in substantiating claims of main home status rather than mere assertions of intent.
  • The tribunal’s decision was consistent with previous case law and existing HMRC guidance.

Legal Principles

  • Determination of a main home for CGT purposes requires consideration of the actual use and connection to the property.
  • Documentary evidence, such as utility bills and presence of personal effects, is essential in proving main home status.
  • Stated intentions carry less weight than documented, factual indicators of use.
  • Reliance on HMRC guidance and precedent ensures consistency and predictability in applying PRR relief.

Conclusion

Morgan v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 181 (TC) established that documentary and factual evidence, not mere ownership or stated intent, are key in determining a taxpayer’s main home for CGT, reinforcing the importance of records and legal precedent in Principal Private Residence claims.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal