Mortgage Corporation v Shaire [2001] Ch 743

Facts

  • Mr. Shaire and Mrs. Shaire jointly owned a property.
  • Mrs. Shaire forged Mr. Shaire’s signature to obtain a mortgage from the Mortgage Corporation.
  • After the parties defaulted on mortgage payments, the Mortgage Corporation sought a sale order under section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA).
  • Mr. Shaire objected to the sale, arguing that his ownership rights should not be affected by the actions of Mrs. Shaire.

Issues

  1. Whether courts should grant a sale order for jointly owned property under TOLATA when a co-owner has defaulted, particularly where the mortgage was obtained by forgery.
  2. Whether the prior approach of automatically favoring lenders in sale applications should remain the standard following TOLATA.
  3. How courts should balance the interests of all parties, including non-defaulting co-owners and any children living in the property, when considering the sale of co-owned property.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal overturned the original sale order.
  • Lord Justice Neuberger held that TOLATA grants courts broad discretion in these matters and that courts are no longer bound to favor lenders automatically.
  • The court emphasized the need to consider all relevant factors, such as the intentions behind the trust, the needs of children or occupants, and the interests of the lender.

Legal Principles

  • Courts possess wide discretion under section 14 of TOLATA and must assess all relevant circumstances, not merely the interests of lenders.
  • Prior to this ruling, courts often ordered sales that primarily favored lenders, but this default approach was rejected.
  • The rights of non-defaulting co-owners, the needs of occupant children, and the intended use of the property must be weighed alongside lender interests.
  • The decision shifted the approach from the automatic sale rules under the Law of Property Act 1925 to a more equitable, case-specific assessment under TOLATA.

Conclusion

Mortgage Corporation v Shaire [2001] Ch 743 is a landmark property law case that ended the presumption in favor of automatic sale orders for mortgage lenders under TOLATA. Courts must now balance all relevant circumstances in sale applications, promoting fairness for both vulnerable owners and lenders, as confirmed by subsequent case law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal