Pascoe v Turner [1979] 1 WLR 431

Facts

  • Mr. Pascoe and Ms. Turner cohabited in a property owned by Mr. Pascoe.
  • Mr. Pascoe made assurances to Ms. Turner that the house would be hers.
  • Relying on these assurances, Ms. Turner expended her own funds on significant improvements to the property.
  • Following the end of their relationship, Mr. Pascoe sought to reclaim the property.
  • Ms. Turner brought a claim based on proprietary estoppel due to her reliance and resulting financial detriment.

Issues

  1. Whether Mr. Pascoe’s assurances to Ms. Turner, relied upon to her financial detriment, satisfied the requirements for proprietary estoppel.
  2. What the appropriate remedy should be to satisfy the equity arising from Ms. Turner’s reliance and detriment.
  3. Whether a transfer of the freehold interest was a proportionate or necessary remedy, as opposed to alternative lesser remedies.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal found all elements of proprietary estoppel—assurance, reliance, and detriment—were present.
  • The court determined that Ms. Turner’s reliance on Mr. Pascoe's representations and her resulting expenditure justified equitable intervention.
  • It was held that mere monetary compensation or the grant of a license or life interest would not be proportionate to the detriment suffered.
  • The court ordered the transfer of the freehold interest in the property to Ms. Turner as the appropriate remedy.
  • Proprietary estoppel prevents a party from denying rights in property where another has relied to their detriment on an assurance or promise.
  • The doctrine requires: (1) clear assurance; (2) reliance on that assurance; and (3) detriment suffered as a result.
  • Flexibility in equitable remedies allows courts to tailor relief according to the claimant’s detriment and the proportionality necessary to satisfy equity in the circumstances.
  • In circumstances of significant reliance and detriment, a transfer of the freehold may be a necessary and proportionate remedy.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal concluded that, as Ms. Turner had relied to her detriment on Mr. Pascoe’s clear assurance and lesser remedies would not have been adequate, the transfer of the freehold interest was warranted to do justice between the parties according to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal