R (Oceana) v Upper Tribunal [2023] EWHC 791 (Admin)

Facts

  • The case concerned a challenge by Oceana to an Upper Tribunal decision relating to fishing quotas.
  • Oceana alleged that the Upper Tribunal misapplied EU law and improperly evaluated key evidence.
  • The claim was considered by the High Court under the legal framework established by Cart and Others v Upper Tribunal.
  • Oceana contended that the Upper Tribunal erred in its approach to both legal interpretation and factual review.

Issues

  1. Whether the Upper Tribunal made a legal error in its decision.
  2. Whether the Upper Tribunal failed to act within its jurisdiction.
  3. Whether there were breaches of fundamental fairness in the process conducted by the Upper Tribunal.

Decision

  • The High Court held that no legal error was made by the Upper Tribunal.
  • It found that differences in the interpretation of legal provisions do not constitute reviewable legal errors.
  • The review of evidence by the Upper Tribunal was held to have complied with lawful standards and proper processes.
  • The High Court reaffirmed the restricted grounds for judicial review of Upper Tribunal decisions under the Cart jurisdiction.
  • The claim was dismissed, emphasizing the exceptional nature of successful challenges.

Legal Principles

  • The Cart jurisdiction restricts judicial review of Upper Tribunal decisions to instances where a clear legal error, jurisdictional overreach, or breach of fundamental process fairness is shown.
  • Mere disagreement with the Tribunal’s legal reasoning or factual findings does not amount to a legal error.
  • To establish unfairness, a claimant must demonstrate a substantial breach of fundamental process rights, not merely dissatisfaction with the decision.
  • The specialist role of the Upper Tribunal is to be respected, and repetitive or weak challenges are discouraged.

Conclusion

The High Court in R (Oceana) v Upper Tribunal reaffirmed the limited scope for judicial review of Upper Tribunal decisions under the Cart principles, requiring clear legal errors or fundamental process failings for intervention, and maintaining deference to the tribunal’s specialist knowledge.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal