R v Monopolies and Mergers Commission, Ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd [1993] 1 WLR 23

Facts

  • The case concerned a merger involving bus services in South Yorkshire.
  • The Monopolies and Mergers Commission (MMC) reviewed the merger under the Fair Trading Act 1973, which covers mergers affecting a "substantial part of the United Kingdom."
  • South Yorkshire, despite being small in land area, was a key market for bus operations due to the concentration of bus routes and their impact on local transportation.
  • The MMC asserted that South Yorkshire represented a "substantial part" of the UK for the relevant market.
  • The House of Lords was called upon to interpret whether the MMC’s intervention was valid given the area's small geographic size.

Issues

  1. Whether "substantial part of the United Kingdom" in the Fair Trading Act 1973 should be interpreted by reference to economic significance or solely by geographic and population size.
  2. Whether the MMC could lawfully intervene in a merger situated in a geographically small but economically significant area.
  3. What factors should determine the boundaries of the relevant market in merger reviews.

Decision

  • The House of Lords ruled that "substantial part" concerns the economic importance of the area, not its land area or population.
  • It held that a smaller region could qualify as a "substantial part" if it has significant economic activity, while a physically larger area might not if it lacks such importance.
  • The Court upheld the MMC’s authority to review and intervene in mergers where the affected area, though small, plays a significant economic role in the relevant market.

Legal Principles

  • "Substantial part of the United Kingdom" under the Fair Trading Act 1973 is determined by the significance of the area in economic terms, not by size or population alone.
  • The "economic function" test requires authorities to assess the merger’s impact on competition, considering factors such as volume of trade, role in the national sector, and local business presence.
  • Defining a relevant market may involve geographic, product, or service boundaries, always focusing on economic activity and competition risks rather than mere physical dimensions.

Conclusion

The House of Lords in R v Monopolies and Mergers Commission, Ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd established that the assessment of a "substantial part" for UK merger reviews is based on economic significance and function rather than physical size, providing enduring guidance for competition law and regulatory authorities.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal