## Facts

- The Registrar of Companies refused to register a company due to a clause in its memorandum of association that purported to exempt directors from liability for acts of negligence or misconduct.
- Mr. Bowen, the applicant, challenged this refusal, arguing that the Registrar exceeded his statutory authority.
- The Companies Act 1908 governed the requirements for company registration, including submission of a memorandum of association and articles of association.
- The objectionable clause was seen to potentially undermine the accountability of directors to shareholders and creditors.

## Issues

1. Whether the Registrar of Companies had the authority to refuse registration on the basis that the company’s memorandum contained an objectionable clause exempting directors from liability for negligence or misconduct.
2. Whether such a clause was consistent with legal principles defining the fiduciary duties of directors.
3. Whether the Registrar’s discretionary power under the Companies Act 1908 permitted the rejection of applications contrary to public policy or established legal principles.

## Decision

- The King’s Bench Division upheld the Registrar’s refusal to register the company.
- The court held that the clause in the memorandum exempting directors from liability contravened established legal principles concerning directorial duties.
- The Registrar was found to have the discretionary power to refuse the registration of companies whose memoranda contain provisions contrary to legal principles or public policy.
- Clauses attempting to exempt directors from liability for negligence or misconduct are impermissible.

## Legal Principles

- Directors owe a fiduciary duty to act in good faith and in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
- Attempts to contractually absolve directors of responsibility for negligence or misconduct undermine these fundamental duties and are legally invalid.
- The Registrar, under the Companies Act 1908, possesses discretion to refuse registration where a company’s constitutional documents breach public policy or established legal principles.
- Judicial interpretation, as demonstrated in this case, clarifies and reinforces statutory requirements for company formation and governance.

## Conclusion

R v Registrar of Companies, ex p Bowen established that company memoranda cannot absolve directors of liability for negligence or misconduct, affirming both the Registrar’s discretionary authority and the foundational nature of directorial fiduciary duties in company law.


R v Registrar of Companies, ex p Bowen [1914] 3 KB 1161