## Facts

- Wandsworth London Borough Council (the local authority) sought to enforce an eviction order against a tenant.
- The legality of the eviction order was challenged on grounds of alleged procedural irregularities.
- The High Court's judgment examined whether the council complied with relevant statutory requirements in obtaining the order.

## Issues

1. Whether the local authority complied with the statutory procedures governing eviction.
2. Whether the procedural requirements under the relevant legislation were satisfied in the service of eviction notices and the conduct of the hearing.
3. Whether procedural fairness was afforded to the tenant in the eviction process.
4. Whether judicial review was available to challenge the eviction order on grounds of procedural non-compliance.

## Decision

- The court held that the local authority failed to comply with essential procedural requirements, specifically relating to service of proper notices and affording the tenant adequate opportunity to respond.
- The eviction order was rendered invalid due to these procedural failures.
- The court clarified that judicial review was available as a remedy to challenge eviction orders based on procedural irregularity rather than mere merits.
- The court emphasized that strict statutory and procedural compliance is necessary for the lawfulness and enforceability of eviction orders.

## Legal Principles

- Public authorities and landlords must strictly comply with statutory provisions and procedural fairness when seeking eviction orders.
- Procedural fairness requires valid service of eviction notices, adequate time and opportunity for tenants to respond, and a fair hearing before the county court.
- Failure to meet statutory or procedural requirements can invalidate eviction orders.
- Judicial review acts as a safeguard to ensure administrative decisions, including eviction orders, meet legal standards and procedural fairness.
- Judicial review is not a substitute for an appeal but is a remedy of last resort for addressing clear legal error or unfairness.

## Conclusion

R v Wandsworth County Court, ex p Wandsworth LBC [1975] 1 WLR 1314 established that eviction orders must conform to statutory and procedural requirements, with any failure rendering such orders invalid. The decision reinforced the importance of procedural fairness and recognized judicial review as a mechanism for tenants to challenge unlawful eviction actions by public authorities.
