## Facts

- The petitioner was a minority shareholder in Elgindata Ltd and alleged that the company's affairs were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to their interests.
- Complaints centered on the actions of the majority shareholder-director, including excessive spending, failure to conduct adequate financial reviews, and delays in producing accounts.
- The company's investments in unprofitable ventures and lack of sufficient financial controls resulted in financial losses.
- Proper accounting practices were not observed, with absent or delayed financial reports impeding the petitioner's ability to monitor company affairs.
- The minority shareholder sought relief under section 994 of the Companies Act 1985, which permits court intervention where company conduct is unfairly prejudicial.

## Issues

1. Whether the conduct of the majority shareholder-director constituted unfairly prejudicial management under section 994 of the Companies Act 1985.
2. Whether financial mismanagement and poor accounting practices satisfy the statutory threshold for unfair prejudice.
3. The extent to which directors' personal interests conflict with their obligations to act in the best interests of the company.
4. The adequacy of legal remedies available to protect minority shareholders from exclusion and mismanagement.

## Decision

- The court determined that, while poor management alone does not automatically amount to unfair prejudice, the combination of financial losses, lack of oversight, and harm to minority shareholder interests can cross the legal threshold.
- Directors are required to act in the best interests of the company rather than for personal advantage.
- The company’s failure to maintain accurate financial records and provide transparent disclosures contributed to the finding of unfair prejudice.
- The court established that section 994 relief could address financial mismanagement, breach of director duties, and exclusion of shareholders from participation.
- Judicial intervention is available in cases of serious mismanagement to prevent majority shareholders from abusing their position.

## Legal Principles

- Section 994 of the Companies Act 1985 allows minority shareholders to seek relief for conduct that is unfairly prejudicial to their interests.
- Directors must act in the interests of the company and not for personal benefit.
- Persistent financial mismanagement, combined with inadequate oversight and exclusion of minority shareholders, can amount to unfair prejudice.
- Courts may intervene to protect minority shareholders where company management disregards proper governance and financial transparency.
- Reliable record-keeping and financial disclosure are essential duties of directors for corporate accountability and shareholder protection.

## Conclusion

Re Elgindata Ltd [1991] BCLC 959 clarified the application of section 994 petitions in cases of financial mismanagement and director misconduct, confirming that sustained disregard for shareholder interests and proper oversight can justify judicial intervention to protect minority rights and ensure sound corporate governance.
