Re Lipinski [1976] Ch 235

Facts

  • The case concerned a testamentary gift made in a will to a group (an unincorporated association) lacking separate legal status.
  • The main issue was whether such a gift could be valid where it was intended to benefit the association's members, rather than the group as a legal entity.
  • The group in question did not possess legal personality, raising questions about the management and validity of the gift.
  • The court considered the intention behind the gift and how it was structured to determine its validity.

Issues

  1. Whether a gift in a will to a group without legal status can be valid under trust law.
  2. Whether the intention of the donor to benefit the members, rather than the group itself, affects the validity of the gift.
  3. How such gifts should be managed and whether they can be accepted under existing trust law principles.

Decision

  • The court held that a gift to a group without legal status may be valid if it is intended to benefit the members, not the group as a separate legal entity.
  • It was decided that the validity of such gifts depends on the donor’s intention and the practical arrangement of the gift.
  • The gift could be managed as a gift to the members as a group, in accordance with the association’s own internal rules.
  • The court’s approach allowed for such gifts to avoid legal issues typically arising from a lack of corporate personality.

Legal Principles

  • The key determinant for validity is the donor’s intention; if a gift is for the direct or indirect benefit of identifiable individuals, it can be upheld.
  • Gifts to unincorporated associations may be valid when construed as gifts to the current members, to be managed under the association’s rules.
  • There is an essential distinction between gifts to associations (as entities) and gifts to their members.
  • General trust law, not charity law, applies to such gifts unless they fall within the legal definition of a charity.

Conclusion

Re Lipinski [1976] Ch 235 established that gifts to groups without legal status are valid when intended for the benefit of members, shaping subsequent trust law by emphasizing donor intention and practical administration over rigid adherence to legal personality requirements.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal