Re Nisbet and Potts' Contract [1906] 1 Ch 386

Facts

  • The case involved a dispute over land that was subject to a restrictive covenant, an encumbrance limiting certain uses of the property.
  • The claimant asserted that their adverse possession of the land had extinguished the restrictive covenant.
  • The defendant argued that the encumbrance remained valid and binding despite the period of adverse possession.
  • The court considered whether adverse possession could extinguish an encumbrance, particularly where the encumbrance was not actively enforced by the encumbrancer.

Issues

  1. Whether adverse possession can extinguish an encumbrance, such as a restrictive covenant, over land.
  2. What conditions must be met for adverse possession to override an encumbrance.
  3. Whether actual or constructive notice of an encumbrance affects its extinguishment by adverse possession.
  4. How the nature and enforcement (or lack thereof) of an encumbrance influence its survival against adverse possession.

Decision

  • The court held that adverse possession can extinguish encumbrances if the possession is exclusive, continuous, and without the owner’s consent.
  • It was ruled that if an encumbrancer takes no steps to enforce their rights during the statutory limitation period, the encumbrance may be extinguished.
  • The court determined that actual or constructive notice of the encumbrance by the adverse possessor is required for extinguishment.
  • The judgment clarified that the extinguishment depends on the nature of the encumbrance and any enforcement actions taken by the encumbrancer.

Legal Principles

  • Adverse possession can extinguish encumbrances if the possessor demonstrates exclusive and continuous possession, inconsistent with the rights of the encumbrancer.
  • The possessor must have actual or constructive notice of the encumbrance for its extinguishment.
  • Encumbrancers who do not enforce their rights risk losing them through the adverse possession of another party.
  • The nature and type of encumbrance and actions taken by the encumbrancer during the limitation period are central to whether an encumbrance is extinguished.
  • For registered land, further statutory protections exist that can affect adverse possession and the extinguishment of encumbrances.

Conclusion

Re Nisbet and Potts’ Contract [1906] 1 Ch 386 clarified that adverse possession, under certain circumstances, can extinguish encumbrances such as restrictive covenants if the possessor meets statutory requirements and the encumbrancer fails to enforce their rights, establishing important guidance for property law regarding the interplay of possession and third-party interests.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal