S Bailey v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 658

Facts

  • Principal residence relief (PRR) under UK tax law exempts certain gains from CGT when a taxpayer sells their main home.
  • The definition of “main residence” is not explicit in statutory law and depends on factual and personal circumstances.
  • S Bailey owned two properties and claimed PRR on the sale of one property.
  • HMRC argued that Bailey’s main home was the other property, relying on the amount of time spent there.
  • The First-tier Tribunal examined both factual details—such as time spent at each property, frequency and consistency of use, and the location of personal items—and Mr. Bailey’s personal circumstances, including his intentions, reasons for using each property, expected stays, and plans.
  • The Tribunal ultimately decided in Bailey’s favor, finding that a balanced review of factual and personal factors confirmed the claimed property as his main home.

Issues

  1. Whether the property sold by Mr. Bailey was his main residence for the purposes of principal residence relief under CGT rules.
  2. Whether factual details alone (such as time spent at each property) suffice to determine main home status, or if personal circumstances and intentions must also be considered.
  3. What evidential and evaluative steps are required to establish a property as a taxpayer’s principal residence in disputes over PRR.

Decision

  • The Tribunal found that a proper determination of “main residence” requires consideration of both factual occupancy and personal circumstances.
  • The Tribunal accepted Mr. Bailey’s claim that the sold property was his main home, emphasizing his reasons, intentions, and supporting evidence over HMRC’s focus on quantitative time spent.
  • The decision confirmed the importance of an overall review rather than relying solely on measurable factors.

Legal Principles

  • Section 105 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 establishes PRR but does not define “main residence,” requiring tribunals to identify it based on facts and personal circumstances.
  • Factual factors include time spent, frequency and consistency of use, and location of personal effects.
  • Personal circumstances—such as reasons for residence, intentions, and future plans—are critical in determining the main home.
  • A combination of clear factual evidence and contextual personal factors is necessary; neither in isolation is sufficient.

Conclusion

The tribunal in S Bailey v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 658 held that identifying a taxpayer’s main residence for PRR purposes necessitates a comprehensive, fact-specific inquiry that considers both objective occupancy data and the taxpayer’s intentions and reasons for residence. Each case must be decided on its individual facts, and both robust records and clear evidence of the taxpayer’s circumstances are essential for a fair outcome.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal