## Facts

- Mr. Schmidt, a German national, was subject to deportation from the United Kingdom under statutory powers exercised by the Home Secretary.
- The Home Secretary ordered Mr. Schmidt's deportation without providing him a hearing or an opportunity to present his case.
- Mr. Schmidt challenged the deportation order based on principles of natural justice, arguing that procedural fairness was required.
- The initial court ruling upheld the Home Secretary's decision, holding that the prerogative power to control immigration did not require compliance with natural justice principles.
- The Court of Appeal, with Lord Denning MR delivering the leading judgment, overturned the initial decision and recognized the necessity of applying fairness principles.

## Issues

1. Whether the statutory power to deport non-citizens requires adherence to the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
2. Whether individuals subject to administrative decisions affecting their rights, specifically in immigration matters, are entitled to a fair hearing.

## Decision

- The Court of Appeal held that the principles of natural justice, particularly fairness, must apply even in the exercise of statutory powers over immigration.
- It was determined that affected individuals have the right to be heard where their rights or interests are at stake.
- The Court found that the duty to act fairly is context-dependent and that administrative bodies must provide appropriate procedural safeguards.
- The initial ruling, which accepted the absence of procedural fairness in immigration decisions, was overturned.

## Legal Principles

- The duty of fairness in administrative law requires public bodies to offer affected parties an opportunity to be heard and mandates impartial decision-making.
- The scope of the duty is flexible and depends on the nature of the administrative action, the rights affected, and the legitimate expectations of those involved.
- The principle of fairness established in this case has been influential in the development of judicial review and subsequent administrative law cases.

## Conclusion

The case established that administrative decision-makers are subject to a common law duty of fairness, requiring fair procedures even in immigration matters. This principle remains foundational in administrative law, shaping the requirements of procedural fairness and influencing later judicial review jurisprudence.


Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs [1969] 2 Ch 149