Schwarzschild v Harrods Ltd [2008] EWHC 521 (QB)

Facts

  • Schwarzschild entrusted certain items of property to Harrods Ltd for safekeeping under an agreement with specified conditions for return.
  • Schwarzschild alleged that Harrods unlawfully retained the property beyond the agreed period, causing financial loss and inconvenience.
  • Harrods argued that retention was justified by contractual terms and operational requirements.
  • The dispute centered on whether Harrods' retention of the property was lawful under the terms of the bailment agreement.

Issues

  1. Whether Harrods Ltd had a lawful justification for retaining Schwarzschild’s property beyond the agreed period.
  2. Whether Harrods breached the bailment agreement by retaining the property without valid legal grounds.
  3. What remedies, if any, Schwarzschild was entitled to as a result of the alleged wrongful retention.

Decision

  • The court focused on whether Harrods had acted within the terms of the bailment agreement or had exceeded its authority.
  • The court examined whether Harrods provided sufficient evidence of lawful justification for retaining the property.
  • Remedies assessed included the return of the property, compensation for loss or damage, and consideration of punitive damages depending on the nature and severity of the breach.

Legal Principles

  • Bailment is the transfer of possession (not ownership) for a specific purpose, requiring the bailee to return or otherwise dispose of property in accordance with the bailor’s instructions.
  • A bailee owes a duty of reasonable care to protect the property and must demonstrate lawful justification for any retention.
  • Unlawful retention occurs when a party keeps property beyond the scope of the bailment without valid legal grounds.
  • Remedies for wrongful retention can include return of the property, compensation for loss or damage, and, in some cases, punitive damages.

Conclusion

The court in Schwarzschild v Harrods Ltd clarified that bailed property must not be retained without lawful justification, reinforcing the obligation of bailees to act within the terms of their agreements and outlining the remedies available for wrongful retention or breach of duty.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal