Simpkins v Pays [1955] 1 WLR 975

Facts

  • The case involved Ms. Simpkins (a paying lodger), Ms. Pays (the homeowner), and Ms. Pays' granddaughter, who all lived together.
  • The three regularly entered a weekly newspaper competition, each contributing one-third of the entry stake.
  • All competition entries were made in Ms. Pays' name, with the understanding that any prize would be shared equally among them.
  • On one occasion, their entry won a prize of £750.
  • Ms. Pays refused to share the winnings, prompting Ms. Simpkins to seek her one-third share through legal action.

Issues

  1. Whether the informal arrangement among the parties to share competition winnings evidenced an intention to create legal relations, sufficient to form a legally binding contract.
  2. Whether the presumption against legal enforceability in domestic or social agreements could be rebutted by the facts of this case.

Decision

  • The court held that a binding contract existed between Ms. Simpkins, Ms. Pays, and the granddaughter to share any winnings equally.
  • The presence of an external party (Ms. Simpkins, the lodger) helped rebut the usual presumption against the intention to create legal relations in domestic agreements.
  • The court found that mutual contributions and the explicit expectation of sharing both the stake and prize money demonstrated an intent to be legally bound.
  • Ms. Simpkins was entitled to one-third of the prize.

Legal Principles

  • The intention to create legal relations is assessed objectively by evaluating surrounding circumstances, contributions, and conduct.
  • Domestic or social agreements carry a presumption against legal enforceability, but this presumption can be rebutted by sufficient evidence showing intent.
  • The involvement of a non-family member and concrete contributions may indicate that parties intended their arrangement to be legally binding.
  • Courts require a fact-specific inquiry into whether an agreement extends beyond a casual familial or social arrangement.

Conclusion

Simpkins v Pays [1955] 1 WLR 975 confirms that the presumption against legal enforceability in domestic settings can be rebutted where there is clear evidence of intention to create legal relations, particularly when an external party and financial contributions are involved.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal