Tennant v Smith [1892] AC 150

Facts

  • Mr. Smith was employed by a bank and provided with free housing as part of his employment.
  • Occupation of the residence was required for Mr. Smith's effective performance of his job.
  • He was not permitted to let others live in the property or derive additional income from it.
  • Tax authorities asserted that the value of the housing should be included in Mr. Smith's taxable income.
  • The dispute over this tax assessment was brought before the courts and ultimately reached the House of Lords.

Issues

  1. Whether the free housing provided to Mr. Smith by his employer constituted taxable income.
  2. Whether a non-monetary employment perk, such as employer-provided housing, should be taxed if it cannot be converted into cash.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that the free housing provided to Mr. Smith was not taxable income.
  • The decision turned on the fact that Mr. Smith could not convert the housing benefit into cash or obtain financial gain beyond its use.
  • The court distinguished between perks that could be turned into cash and those that merely reduced personal living expenses, determining that only the former are taxable as income.

Legal Principles

  • The case established the convertibility test as the primary method for determining if a non-monetary employment perk is taxable: only perks that can be converted into cash are considered taxable income.
  • Non-monetary perks that solely satisfy personal needs, and cannot be transferred or monetized, fall outside the scope of taxable income.
  • Later cases, such as Reed v Seymour [1927] 11 TC 625 and Heaton v Bell [1970] AC 728, further clarified the importance of convertibility, considering whether an employee could choose between a perk or cash, or if any restrictions existed on transferring or selling the benefit.

Conclusion

Tennant v Smith [1892] AC 150 remains a leading authority on the taxation of non-monetary employment perks, establishing the convertibility principle as central to distinguishing between taxable and non-taxable benefits, a rule that continues to influence tax law on work income.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal