Tichborne v Weir (1892) 67 LT 735

Facts

  • The dispute concerned a leasehold property held by Tichborne, who had a term of years under the lease.
  • Weir, the defendant, claimed to have acquired title to the property via adverse possession.
  • Weir argued that his occupation was open, exclusive, and continuous for the statutory period applicable to adverse possession, contending this extinguished Tichborne’s leasehold interest.
  • Tichborne disputed that Weir’s occupation met the requirements for adverse possession, asserting that it was not adverse or sufficient to override the leaseholder’s rights.
  • The court was required to examine whether Weir’s possession fulfilled the legal criteria necessary to defeat Tichborne’s leasehold.

Issues

  1. Whether Weir’s occupation of the leasehold property satisfied the legal requirements for adverse possession as against the leaseholder.
  2. Whether the nature of Weir’s possession was sufficiently exclusive, continuous, and open, and without permission, to extinguish Tichborne’s leasehold rights.
  3. How the existence and terms of the lease affected the application of adverse possession principles in this context.

Decision

  • The court held that Weir’s occupation did not meet the legal requirements for adverse possession as against Tichborne’s leasehold interest.
  • It was found that Weir’s possession lacked the necessary exclusivity and continuity required for a successful adverse possession claim.
  • The lease agreement was found to play a decisive role in defining the rights of the parties, and Tichborne’s leasehold rights could not be extinguished without clear and compelling evidence of adverse possession.

Legal Principles

  • Adverse possession claims in leasehold contexts require the claimant to demonstrate exclusive, continuous, and open possession for the statutory period, without the leaseholder’s consent.
  • The rights and obligations defined by the lease agreement are central in determining whether adverse possession can defeat a leasehold interest.
  • The burden is on the claimant to provide unequivocal evidence that their occupation satisfies the strict statutory and common law requirements for adverse possession, particularly in leasehold situations.

Conclusion

Tichborne v Weir (1892) 67 LT 735 clarified that adverse possession claims against a leasehold require strict satisfaction of exclusivity and continuity criteria without consent, and that leaseholder rights remain protected absent clear evidence of adverse possession.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal